World Famous Message Board Message Board Podcast
What's LetsRun.com? Contact Us Advertise on LetsRun.com
Shop Subscribe
Sign In
Running's Homepage
Message Board World Famous Message Board Podcast
What's LetsRun.com? Contact Us Advertise on LetsRun.com
Shop Subscribe
  • Get VIP Access
Sign In
  • LetsRun.com Account
    • Sign In
    • Register Account
  • LetsRun.com Supporters Club
    • Join
  • Homepage
    • Today's Homepage
  • World Famous Message Board
    • Main Forum
    • Training Forum
    • College Forum
    • High School Forum
    • Shoes & Gear
  • LetsRun.com Podcast
    • Apple Podcasts
    • Google Podcasts
    • Spotify
    • Other Services
  • Shop
    • T-shirts
    • Coaching Plans
  • About LetsRun.com
    • What's LetsRun.com?
    • Contact
    • Advertise

Post a Reply

Replying to Is it necessary? (post #1). View original post.

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

  • Register an Account
  • Forgot Username?
  • Forgot Password?
Note: We have detected you are using Firefox on Android. The editor has known issues with Android Firefox and may be difficult to use. We are both working with the developers to fix it and developing an alternative. If you encounter issues, please use a different browser to post.
Post Preview
By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.
If you are having trouble posting, please visit the Message Board troubleshooting page.

Replying To:

RULE 40, is it BS?

Is it necessary?

Summary here:

http://www.oiselle.com/blog/birds-eye-view-rule-40-explained

Basically it bans athletes from mentioning their sponsors, and it bans sponsors from even acknowledging their athletes and the olympics even exist while the olympics are going on.

Is this necessary to protect olympic sponsors? Or just another case of corruptness within sport?

Back to this thread.