Of course it will but the elite will take credit for curbing it. The numbers would have been the same but we would not have given up our freedoms or our assets or our income. The sheep will be used to a police state and will beg for it every time it rains or snows or the flu comes or another country sends a threatening text.
Trying to understand numbers...so 66,000 total dead as of yesterday in the world with a population of 7,800,000,000 people. So is it 8000/7.8 Billion to get death percentage.
And do we use 8500/340,000,000 for the US death rate?
Thanks, I'll take my answer off the air.
Fair Shake wrote:
Trying to understand numbers...so 66,000 total dead as of yesterday in the world with a population of 7,800,000,000 people. So is it 8000/7.8 Billion to get death percentage.
And do we use 8500/340,000,000 for the US death rate?
Thanks, I'll take my answer off the air.
Well usually you try to figure out how many people got the virus and then added those people that got it how many people did it actually kill
What makes it complicated is that you don't know if the virus is always the main cause of the person's death
Like if the person is already in the hospital for something serious it can be hard to tell if the virus is what killed them or if they just happen to have the virus
Also I'm sure we can not always have deaths statistics in real-time but that must be a pretty well-kept statistic. I mean obviously if someone dies that has to be recorded. There might be a bit of a delay in getting the total butt you would think that that would be a pretty important statistic.
So the world death rate comes out as .00085% and the US rate is at .0025% using my previous numbers, or do we not count total population and only count deaths vs. confirmed cases of virus? What about the cases that were never officially logged because people never got sick or just had a mild case of the virus? Do they count in the numbers?
Is this correct?
Where is the 2% number coming from that everyone is talking about?
There are so many numbers being bandied about that I don't know what holds sway?
Really not trying to be facetious, but there is so much info being thrown around that it's hard to know what counts.
What do we compare the numbers to?
"And when the last male noble of Camelot perishes,
In the waves of Bay upon the Chesapeake,
The underground children will be eradicated
For emerging elite to say,
'Stay at home and await my command',
the solution of silk disguised as a Brand
Whom we all know and trust,
Will enter our veins and control our minds."
- Mxiest 1827
I gotta say, I wish these conspiracy theories were legit. We need some drama. But they never come to fruition. These sheep are obsessed with an arbitrary number (666) that only man created and assigned as "evil." There hasn't been a single dream of these sheep come true, it's always a downward spiral that never ends, yet has no beginning. Manipulation of data is all they can hang their hats on. I've been on this Earth four decades, accumulated wealth, and have witnessed all humankind be as fragile as the dust they are comprised of.
AT THESWOOSH wrote:
I gotta say, I wish these conspiracy theories were legit. We need some drama. But they never come to fruition. These sheep are obsessed with an arbitrary number (666) that only man created and assigned as "evil." There hasn't been a single dream of these sheep come true, it's always a downward spiral that never ends, yet has no beginning. Manipulation of data is all they can hang their hats on. I've been on this Earth four decades, accumulated wealth, and have witnessed all humankind be as fragile as the dust they are comprised of.
I wish I could like this a billion times.
Wuhan-396 wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EUJPVQMXQAIe1vi?format=jpg&name=4096x4096
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1998) - Too Much Adrenochrome:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6kFCNsnQpQ[quote]Wuhan-394 wrote:
Daily NEW Cases In USA:
March 5: 63
March 6: 98
March 7: 116
March 8: 106
March 9: 163
March 10: 290
March 11: 307 (Bad Wigins "only [total] 2600 cases 20 days from now")
March 12: 396
March 13: 553
March 14: 587
March 15: 843
March 16: 983
March 17: 1748
March 18: 2853
March 19: 4582
March 20: 5595
March 21: 4825
March 22: 9400
March 23: 10189
March 24: 11075
March 25: 13355
March 26: 17224
March 27: 18691
March 28: 19452
March 29: 19913
March 30: 20353
March 31: 24742
April 1: 26473
April 2: 29874
April 3: 32284
April 4: 34196
April 5: 25316
Coronavirus Cases: 336,673
Closed Cases
Recovered: 17,977
Deaths: 9,616 (35%)
Active Cases: 309,080
Daily New Deaths (USA):
March 21: 46
March 22: 113
March 23: 141
March 24: 225
March 25: 247
March 26: 268
March 27: 400
March 28: 525
March 29: 363
March 30: 558
March 31: 912
April 1: 1049
April 2: 974
April 3: 1045
April 4: 1330
April 5: 1165
Fair Shake wrote:
So the world death rate comes out as .00085% and the US rate is at .0025% using my previous numbers, or do we not count total population and only count deaths vs. confirmed cases of virus? What about the cases that were never officially logged because people never got sick or just had a mild case of the virus? Do they count in the numbers?
Is this correct?
Where is the 2% number coming from that everyone is talking about?
There are so many numbers being bandied about that I don't know what holds sway?
Really not trying to be facetious, but there is so much info being thrown around that it's hard to know what counts.
What do we compare the numbers to?
People toss out numbers like a 2% mortality rate because we don't have the whole picture. There is no way that everyone infected gets tested. Even fauci said that you shouldn't get tested unless you basically need to go to the hospital because you can't breath. Considering most people are probably not going to the hospital for mild or asymptomatic cases, they will never be counted as having the virus. So you can either take the numbers given as absolute truth or you can be reasonable and assume the numbers are likely not as bad as stated (not that they still aren't bad and obviously some areas are worse than others) without really having any real numbers at all.
The government needs to make up for its lack of preparedness by scaring people into thinking this is dangerous when in reality the odds of it being life threatening are extremely slim. Otherwise everyone would still be going about their daily lives and building herd immunity while many more would die. We would get through this way way faster doing that but I guess someone figured it would look bad if people were dying because there aren't enough beds in the hospitals.
Then a few seconds later, at 33:45, Gates drops another bomb:
We don’t want to have a lot of recovered people...
To be clear, we’re trying – through the shut-down in the United States – to not get to one percent of the population infected. We’re well below that today, but with exponentiation, you could get past that three million [people or approximately one percent of the U.S. population being infected with COVID-19 and the vast majority recovering]. I believe we will be able to avoid that with having this economic pain.”
It appears that rather than let the population be exposed to the virus and most develop antibodies that give them natural, long-lasting immunity to COVID-19, Gates and his colleagues far prefer to create a vast, hugely expensive, new system of manufacturing and selling billions of test kits, and in parallel very quickly developing and selling billions of antivirals and vaccines.
And then, when the virus comes back again a few months later and most of the population is unexposed and therefore vulnerable, again selling billions of test kits and medical interventions.
Right after that, at 34:14, Gates talked about how he sees things rolling out from there.
Eventually what we’ll have to have is certificates of who’s a recovered person, who’s a vaccinated person...
...Because you don’t want people moving around the world where you’ll have some countries that won’t have it under control, sadly.
You don’t want to completely block off the ability for people to go there and come back and move around.
So eventually there will be this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global reopening up.”
[Some time on the afternoon of March 31 the last sentence of this quote was edited out of the official TED video of the interview. Fortunately, recordings of the complete interview are archived elsewhere.]
[quote]real info wrote:
You can tell the data in that chart is crap because it pretends that it's simple to track the number of deaths in real time. Death reporting doesn't work like that.
You can tell the data is crap because it lumps flu and pneumonia together. One is infection with a type of germ, the other is infection in a particular part of your body.
You can tell the data is crap because it has pneumonia in a different category than cornonavirus. Covid-19 attacks the lungs and causes pneumonia.
You can tell the data is crap because it does not conform to the official narrative that real info has swallowed whole.
Can someone publish an article with graphs about projected death toll numbers from economic recession and despair. Compare it with death toll projections of COVID infections.
Allen53 wrote:
Can someone publish an article with graphs about projected death toll numbers from economic recession and despair. Compare it with death toll projections of COVID infections.
Here you Allen53 - how about this bombshell! (an astute poster linked this on Jon's No More Fake News blog):
https://youtu.be/CvHp5Cy12T0"Even in the worst projections, more people are going to die from cigarette smoking than from #CoronaVirus” this year."
Mindblowing or what? ?
In Maryland, Leilani Jordan, 27, a greeter at the Giant’s Campus Way South store in Largo, died last week.
“She said, ‘Mommy, I’m going to work because no one else is going to help the senior citizens get their groceries,’ ” her mother, Zenobia Shepherd, told The Washington Post. “She only stopped going to work when she could no longer breathe.”
Her last day at work was March 16, according to Giant spokesman Daniel Wolk. Jordan tested positive for the coronavirus in late March and died Wednesday.
Daily NEW Cases In USA:
March 5: 63
March 6: 98
March 7: 116
March 8: 106
March 9: 163
March 10: 290
March 11: 307 (Bad Wigins "only [total] 2600 cases 20 days from now")
March 12: 396
March 13: 553
March 14: 587
March 15: 843
March 16: 983
March 17: 1748
March 18: 2853
March 19: 4582
March 20: 5595
March 21: 4825
March 22: 9400
March 23: 10189
March 24: 11075
March 25: 13355
March 26: 17224
March 27: 18691
March 28: 19452
March 29: 19913
March 30: 20353
March 31: 24742
April 1: 26473
April 2: 29874
April 3: 32284
April 4: 34196
April 5: 25316
April 6: 30331
Coronavirus Cases: 367,004
Closed Cases
Recovered: 19,671
Deaths: 10,876 (36%)
Active Cases: 336,462
Daily New Deaths (USA):
March 21: 46
March 22: 113
March 23: 141
March 24: 225
March 25: 247
March 26: 268
March 27: 400
March 28: 525
March 29: 363
March 30: 558
March 31: 912
April 1: 1049
April 2: 974
April 3: 1045
April 4: 1330
April 5: 1165
April 6: 1255
Allen53 wrote:
Can someone publish an article with graphs about projected death toll numbers from economic recession and despair. Compare it with death toll projections of COVID infections.
This in an above link. I'm not vouching for the source, but it does cover the topic and might lead to a better source.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/04/01/could-the-covid19-response-be-more-deadly-than-the-virus/Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Matt Choi was drinking beer halfway through the Boston Marathon