Godspeed a safe recovery Greta.
Godspeed a safe recovery Greta.
Get well soon, Greta. Supposedly 10 year olds show no symptoms so she should be fine
Shame
addddddddd wrote:
she looks like she has cancer
She has a serious case of veganism.
Publicity stunt since the little weirdo has been pushed off the news as of late.
I think BM is in the lead for most coronavirus threads started.
anti-Greta wrote:
Publicity stunt since the little weirdo has been pushed off the news as of late.
It does have a serious "Look at MEEEE" gist to it. It must be painful to have real global problems push her off the stage.
if she really has it wrote:
Get well soon, Greta. Supposedly 10 year olds show no symptoms so she should be fine
Good news for you, too.
I've followed global warming research/commentary for about 15 years now. One of AGW's major theories will be proven or disproven in the next two months. That premise is that the rise in atmospheric CO2 levels is directly related to the rise in manmade CO2 emissions. I personally believe that this is true.
CO2 levels are monitored at Mauna Loa and hit new highs every year in May/June. However, global CO2 emissions have dropped significantly worldwide due to Covid 19 and especially in China, which is upwind from Mauna Loa.
Here's why this is important.
If CO2 concentrations continue to rise at the same rate as last year, this would invalidate AGW theory that manmade emissions are causing the rise in CO2. It would also invalidate the premise that the Green New Deal will make any difference.
If CO2 concentrations actually decline, it would invalidate the premise that CO2 emissions remain in the atmosphere for decades. This would negate the necessity for radical action now. We could simply wait until 2030 or so when better technology exists to reduce CO2 levels.
OTOH, if the rate of increase slows or pauses, it would tend to validate *part* of AGW theory. That is, that atmospheric CO2 rise is directly attributable to manmade CO2 emissions. However, it wouldn't prove that the models predicting future changes are accurate.
Can we not say anything bad about people who might have the virus. Smdh.
NERunner053 wrote:
Can we not say anything bad about people who might have the virus. Smdh.
I would agree about that. Unless it were Trump. Then I might say - in his words - that it was "a beautiful day". Easter Sunday would be nice.
I'm sure her handlers instructed her to do this
Of course she has it. She spent the past 6 months polluting the environment by flying all over the world. In the process, she was exposed to every disease out there.
Armstronglivs wrote:
if she really has it wrote:
Get well soon, Greta. Supposedly 10 year olds show no symptoms so she should be fine
Good news for you, too.
Here's the demented idiot insulting people for no reason...
So alarmists are in a bad spot right now and have more scenarios to disprove their beliefs than support it.
anti-Greta wrote:
Publicity stunt since the little weirdo has been pushed off the news as of late.
Yup. She "believes" she had the Wuhan flu. She was not diagnosed. Her 15 minutes has long past, and needs to go away.
uhhhg wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Good news for you, too.
Here's the demented idiot insulting people for no reason...
You mean, the way people are insulting Greta Thunberg for no reason? Your own dementia seems quite advanced.
Ashley Madison wrote:
anti-Greta wrote:
Publicity stunt since the little weirdo has been pushed off the news as of late.
Yup. She "believes" she had the Wuhan flu. She was not diagnosed. Her 15 minutes has long past, and needs to go away.
Like climate change.
Soros funded freaks wrote:
I'm sure her handlers instructed her to do this
Of course you're sure. If you believe it it must be true. Alternative facts.