casual obsever wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
Mr. Half the facts to the rescue!
Top reason -- "lack of evidence"
Stop deflecting. Your original statement wasn't about the top reason:
rekrunner wrote:
I do not and have never argued that any performance is clean or dirty.
But I will not go into your endless troll circle with you. Just keep lying about this, and attacking me.
I guess I should know better than to say "never".
In this thread Armstronglivs says I "consistently argued that elite performances are clean".
You also said I "spent years arguing that Paula was clean".
By March 2016, less than one year later, my arguments conceded the possibility, as I also had no evidence that she did not dope: "My claim is not radical or heretical: doping always remains a possibility, but simply, with the current knowledge and data, it is not the ONLY plausible one."
We can see that it was not "consistently argued" and not for "years".
The quote you found was in response to the question "Who still thinks Paula is clean? ... and why?" In such a thread, we were entitled to share our personal thoughts (beliefs), and I argued why I thought so at that time. These arguments have not changed.