casual obsever wrote:
Ultraboy wrote:
Those tests were done using newer tests, hence why they had come back clean before but now come back with an adverse finding.
^This.
That's exactly why Farah's 2011/2012 samples should get retested now, and why UKAD is opposed to it.
If UKAD was really concerned about this, why would they not just draw blood from either
1) Farah during a period when he was not actually on anything
2) Some random clean person to be passed off as Farah's sample
Then use these two to replace the supposedly tainted samples?
Seems a lot easier than just going through this huge mess.