wwharrier wrote:
Great example on why they say so many so many morons are on letsrun. Sorry brojo's.
Speak for yourself.
I'm literally a genius.
Your welcome...
wwharrier wrote:
Great example on why they say so many so many morons are on letsrun. Sorry brojo's.
Speak for yourself.
I'm literally a genius.
Your welcome...
Obviously you're not of 140 on a Weschler's series 4 test. Btw...It's you're not your*. Idiot.
Wechsler's*....IDIOT
You must be a newb.
Discus...
The article isn't in reference to Bekele, I never mentioned Bekele - so what exactly does he have to do with it?
Would I "dig" around to find out your coaching credentials? I have as much interest in who you are as I do in Hep C mate.
And if you think "being registered" on the Letsrun message board means anything at all with respect to track and field knowledge you are tragically deluded my friend.
Salvatore Stitchmo wrote:
The article isn't in reference to Bekele, I never mentioned Bekele - so what exactly does he have to do with it?
Would I "dig" around to find out your coaching credentials? I have as much interest in who you are as I do in Hep C mate.
And if you think "being registered" on the Letsrun message board means anything at all with respect to track and field knowledge you are tragically deluded my friend.
It was me who mentioned Bekele and yes I agree with you that these posters should not be questioning Nick Willis's words of wisdom.
I was trying to point out to people like the person you are arguing with just how little they know about distance running.
wwharrier wrote:
This statement shows your limited intelligence on the sport. Lets break this down by math. A 12.0 is a 24.0 200m, a 48.0 400m, a 1:36.0 800m. Let that sink in. Jim Ryun's close in his last 1200 of a 1500 is still the best in history IMO. Matt Centrowitz closing in 50x during a 3:50x 1500m. Nope, 50x and 48.0 are still night and day. Please pardon the slight sarcasm but if Bekele was an athlete that could close in 12.0, he'd be a 48.0 athlete and please tell me what a 48.0 400m 2:01 marathon Bekele would be for the in between distances....I would genuinely like to hear.
No, you don't know what you are talking about. Bekele is a long distance runner, not a middle distance runner. Bekele's fastest 100m splits were 12.5 seconds. How can you claim to be an expert and not know the difference between different types of athletes?
Hardloper wrote:
not so fast dude wrote:
No he did not. Don't be ridiculous.
It was more like 13-mid. I think people confuse the end of the exchange zone (90m to go) with 100m due to the larger turns and shorter straights on the Brussels track.
I clocked him at 26 seconds for the last 200. Do you remember back in 2009 when a certain poster was insisting that Bekele ran sub 12 for the last 100m in the World Championship 5000 when it was actually 13.4? Someone even changed the Wikipedia page at the time to make that ridiculous claim.
Again...you state 12.5. I am discussing the closing of 12.0. 12.5 and 12.0 are night and day. Don't be that stupid.
epicTCK wrote:
Belarussiya wrote:
Definitely crazy talk here. A 100 fly should never be a requirement for a 4 minute miler, and I couldn't imagine anyone running slower than 12 for a 100 fly. As far as I know, the slowest 400 meter time possible for someone that is in shape to run a 4 minute mile is around 54-55 seconds. If anyone can show me where a sub 4 miler ran slower than a 55 second 400 I would be greatly interested to see.
There isn't a single guy who can only run 54 and broke 4. In fact, It's probably not possible or very, very, very rare to go sub 2 with 55 speed. If you had a 55 second 400m runner, the fastest they could run for the 8 (if they had extremely good endurance) might be mid-high 1:57. And no one can run sub 4 off of 1:57 800m
Mike Tate 53 and 4 minute mile.
Look at Sullivan and his 100 mile base weeks.
Does anyone have advice on how to get to a flying 100m faster? I have always had great endurance even when I was younger, but the fastest I've ever gone in a flying 100m (though not all out - probably slightly faster than 400 effort) was 12.9. But I have run a 4 mile tempo in 19:40.
I know this is 3 years old, but you really think Bekele's top speed was 50 second 400m pace?
Bumping this thread as I have the aerobic endurance but not the leg speed. I have only hit a flying 12.7 as my fastest flying 100 after a rest day, but most of my strides have been around ~13.3 after an 8 mile easy run. I've also run 4 mile tempos in 19:45 and a 1:54 800. Is it possible for me to get under 4 this indoors? I think I could run ~52 in a 400 but have never trained specifically for it
In my day, I could do both...barely. Ran 3:44 1500 and 4:02 mile.
When I was in 4:05 shape I could hit 23 as a fast 200 at the end of a cutdown set of 200s. I could have run under 20 for 4 miles, but it wouldn't have been a tempo for me (probably 22 min. or so would have been about tempo pace). What the original thread was getting at is that there is a combination of fitnesses at a certain level needed to break 4:00. This mix can differ by person.
For what it's worth, I think I could have run 4:03 in a better paced race. I also had 49/50 400 m. speed and could run 1:49. There are plenty of guys with slower 800 ability than I had that have broken 4:00, though (or who have equivalent 800 ability and ran way under 4:00). I wouldn't limit yourself--see how you continue to improve and work on what you need to work on. For me, the two great "what if" questions about my training are "what if I had taken my in-season recovery days easier so I didn't get overtrained" and "what if I had incorporated more tempo and 5km pace workouts?" I think it could have made a difference. It's all about finding the right mix of training at the right time.
Since when is a 4 mile run at 10k pace a 'tempo'?
If a guy can run 3:41.0 1500m and 5:02.5 2000m, he should be able to race sub-4 1 mile.
Standard HS tempo🤣seriously should be around 30mins for a 10k with that tempo. With all this stuff there are exceptions. Only run 12.8? Better be a 28:00 10k guy. Have a 49s quarter? You can get away with being a 31:00 guy
Yes I can do both wrote:
Yes I can do both, the sub 12.5 would probably be a tighter finish, can easily run a sub 20 four mile tempo. Could race four miles in about 18:30. My mile PR is 4:04... So I don't think that's the formula for breaking 4. And actually, I can name a few guys that couldn't break 25 in an 8k race (so a tempo would be nowhere near 5 flat pace) but they could easily break 4 in the mile.
I don’t think anyone “easily breaks 4” in the mile. Takes talent, effort, and years of training
Nick Willis couldn't break wind.
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these