Screwed Either Way wrote:
rare wrote:
In hindsight, the brojos really set themselves up for these feminist complaints with this competition. Separate genders would have probably been a better idea.
She would have complained either way, especially if a black woman or man doesn't win. This makes so much sense now, so SHE is the one on LRC that always pops up into threads calling us racist when discussing black runner news but she disappears the moment we diss Sage or any white runner.
I wasn't aware of her calling the site racist. Did she do that?
I just really disagree with her logic, and name calling. It's disappointing because she has inspired so many people throughout her career, yet now is casually labeling many of them as misogynists. Labeling someone as "racist" and "misogynist" is a very serious accusations today and shouldn't be done casually.
I think her logic is that since not enough women's races advanced in the voting or weren't included to begin with LetsRun (not sure if its people who work with the site or founded it like myself or all the people who visit it or what) is misogynistic. If she wants to target me or the people behind the article I'm fine with that as at least it's only a few people, but to label a whole group of people who didn't vote for women's races as misogynistic is way over the top. You're a bad person if you didn't vote for a women's race is the message I think. Or perhaps misogyny is the only explanation that can explain why more women's races didn't advance?
But by that same logic can LetsRun no longer be called racist (if in fact she made that allegation which I've never heard)? The vast majority of races involve people of color. All 4 regions were named after people of color.
Is there some sort of magical number of category XYZ people that has to make the cut to prove we're not racist, sexist, or something else?
I just wish we could disagree with people these days without immediately labeling them as racist or sexist or what not. Or should I instead say Alysia is a xenophobic bigot since all of the people she cites are American?
No that would be idiotic. I think it's just best to say I disagree with her logic. But in today's twitter world, one's base gets rallied up with labels, a sense of moral superiority, instead of searching for common ground.
Think even if her tweet had been "Can't believe more of the great women's races didn't make the the final four"? That's a much more inclusive message than what she tweeted. Made we then could have a discussion on biases, implicit biases, performance in sport, etc.
If anything I'd understand the argument that there shouldn't even be the special American bracket that we had. That in a perfect world we'd just evaluate all performances the same no matter what country they come from or any affinity we have for the person. However, that's not the world we live in as evidenced by her tweet mentioning only Americans. Does that make us or her a bad person? I definitely don't think so.