talkin' talent wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Oh, right - the same way a fraudster "augments" their account with someone else's money?
Depends if the fraudster made 95% on their own first.
No, it doesn't. Cheating remains cheating - whether it is done a lot or a little. Doping is cheating. If it wasn't it wouldn't be known as doping - it would be called something like, taking "nutritional supplements". But who would believe that all Ben Johnson and Lance Armstrong were doing was taking a few harmless nutritional supplements? For a start, they didn't think that - or they wouldn't have done it. To argue that doping isn't really doping because it confers no advantage requires a special kind of idiocy.