Guelph Implodes

SB wrote:

fred wrote:

Then, that is the failure of the system, it's rigid and not open. It's been stripped of the human dynamics. Homo sapiens are mammals with biological drives. If the system was open, it would acknowledge that, and not rigidify behaviour. The person above the coach would accept that pair bonding might occur, that everything is in play, and that it's their job to make sure that no benefits are given to the athlete in relationship. So instead of point blank stratifying how everything should occur, they need to go beyond the simplicity of their worldview. It's an environment with brilliant thought;they should catch up.

That's some interesting institutional anthropology. Care to make this argument under your own actual name?

I didn't think so, professor. Now you're just trolling.

Fred is an old nut job that lives in Guelph and loves sniffing the jocks of the boys on the team. He must be pushing 80 by now. His real name is actually Fred.

Alanzo Ryan traded to UG from The 6ix

discus

Rebuilding has begun!

fred wrote:

If a 20 year old woman fell in love with a 40 year old man, and vice versa, and they exchanged love letters, would that deep state of attraction not supercede any defined status imposed on them by a corporate expectation. The corporate entity was interested in protecting its own pecuniary objectives, and itself lied to project a public image. Many would say that the corporate entity was immoral depending upon their own grasp of ethics and values.

Therefore, there is nothing to look at here, other than AC.

A coach at a university cannot have a relationship with a current student athlete. It’s in the coach’s contract with the university. It’s a fireable offence, no debate needed.

Clubs have their own rules in regards to these things so that would vary from club to club.

Fred’s a creep, but this humiliation is going to toughen him up, just like the abusive coaching philosophy he keeps wishing on young runners.

Poetic justice.

jesseriley wrote:

Fred’s a creep, but this humiliation is going to toughen him up, just like the abusive coaching philosophy he keeps wishing on young runners.

Poetic justice.

He will also have alienated himself completely from the larger Guelph/SR community-- assuming he ever had more than fanboy (fan-geriatric, if the above is correct) connection. Because they are largely in shock at the moment, and would be horrified by the things he's been saying here. If this is his idea of helping/defending, he's even more delusional than he comes across.

you mean he's a real person??????

HistoryRunner wrote:

you mean he's a real person??????

Apparently.

SB wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

Fred’s a creep, but this humiliation is going to toughen him up, just like the abusive coaching philosophy he keeps wishing on young runners.

Poetic justice.

He will also have alienated himself completely from the larger Guelph/SR community-- assuming he ever had more than fanboy (fan-geriatric, if the above is correct) connection. Because they are largely in shock at the moment, and would be horrified by the things he's been saying here. If this is his idea of helping/defending, he's even more delusional than he comes across.

There isn't going to be any running larger Guelph/SR community. It's over.

It would seem strange that speed river would have a rule permitting this, but to each their own I guess

Fred, the mythical Psych degree that you claim to have would have taught you that your mentality, “It’s all over,” is just a narcissistic projection.

Your strange world is over, but youth will still run & compete without your abusive attitude. And they’ll probably be a lot happier & healthier.

taxation is theft

jesseriley wrote:

Fred, the mythical Psych degree that you claim to have would have taught you that your mentality, “It’s all over,” is just a narcissistic projection.

Your strange world is over, but youth will still run & compete without your abusive attitude. And they’ll probably be a lot happier & healthier.

First of all everyone has a degree. It;s nothing. And you are a maroon

And you would not know what a narcissistic projection. was, even while looking in the mirror.

So thanks for the dumba$$ commentary from a jogger who has never puked a workout.

I puke in my throat every time you post: I’m allergic to bvllshi+!

I recommend everyone here be fully familiar with the entirety of these codes of conduct, but specifically these items...it need NOT be in the coaches contract to find oneself required to uphold the values held by the governing associations. Any coach that contravenes these cannot be a USport, AO, or AC sanctioned coach, regardless of what the contract explicitly stipulates. It's not much different that your employment contract fails to stipulate good behaviour. There are still rules and laws in place you must adhere to!

No work place anywhere, anytime, condones fraternizing with subordinates. It's simply a reflection of the poor standards we're holding ourselves to to argue that it's "okay" under the right circumstances. We still frequently run into university level coaches who feel coach/athlete relationships are "between the two people involved".

For the record, it's never OK for a coach to date their athletes, it's never condoned, and will result in termination now, or in the future. The sport in general will begin to flourish once we establish a base level of professionalism that ensures we rarely, or hopefully never, have to see these kinds of events again.

Athletics Canada Çode of Conduct:

AO Code of Conduct for coaches:

COACHING ASSOCIATION OF CANADA(CAC) CODE OF CONDUCT

OUA CODE OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS

Fine, I'm not talking about sex. I'm talking about 2 human beings falling overwhelmingly in love with each other. Is that included in your partly clouded overcast?

And secondly, do you have any actual direct evidence that any untoward activity has occurred within the city limits with the said parties involved?

Dump dst & lose fred as a bonus.