I'm not downplaying. I'm removing ambiguity that enables exaggeration, imagination and fantasy.
a) Salazar's role in Magness excessive infusion was considered "Administration"
b) The email was considered attempted tampering with the process
c) Giving his son's testosterone was considered trafficking
While they may sound very different to you, these acts were the violations. The problem with listing just the titles of the articles violated, while ignoring the details, is the ambiguity it creates leads to imagination and fantasy, especially for those who have not read, and will not read, the report. We see this time and time again.
By enabling imagination, you end up with creative emotional analogies like "there was a murder but no victim". There was no murder. There was an excessive infusion, an email, and transfer of "T" to Salazar's sons (administration, tampering and trafficking), and the victims were Magness, doping control process, and Salazar's sons.
None of this falls under the category of "drug cheat apologist". The "drug cheat" recipients are Magness, and Salazar's sons, none of whom I'm apologizing for. In fact, contrary to "apologizing", I think Magness was also largely responsible for the "Administration" violation, as he was responsible for finding a "WADA legal" way.
You might say Salazar is a drug cheat, but I have not apologized for Administration, Tampering, or Trafficking, nor for his use of Testosterone without a prescription.
If you argue again "drug cheat apologist", I will question again your intelligence, and/or honesty.
And finally, I don't want posts deleted. Stop blaming me for something that was clearly due to others' lack of self-control.