Isn't this what we already knew just playing out?
Bach said he would ask the questions to WADA for answers.
And now Reedie responds by saying WADA will find out the answers and get back to Bach.
This may very well be one outcome -- that WADA reviews the AAA panel findings, USADA's evidence, including the exhibits, witness testimonies, transcripts; Salazar's evidence; combined with athlete data in ADAMS, and accepts the thoroughness USADA's investigation and the AAA Panel findings.
In the meantime, for uninformed fans like you, without the benefit of all this extra data, you can imagine and fanatasize about many things which have little to do with the evidence and findings already accumulated, or resembling any new evidence and findings yet to be made public.
How can they being doing this? Haven't we heard from rekrunner that the possibility NOP athletes might have doped is all "imagination" and "fantasyland"? Why don't they simply accept the AAA panel finding of "no evidence" as the last word on the question - as he does? Perhaps their logic in seeking answers to this question is superior to his.
What this guy said, we need to review testimonies and evidence at least three more times, maybe something like a three year timeline, these things can’t be rushed.
I for one Have very little doubt that NOP athletes/test subjects are in fact clean. Listen, just because a coach is found guilty of experimenting with performance enhancing drugs, whose athletes then have suspiciously improved performance, does not in any way whatsoever implicate those athletes. I just want to make sure this dead hoarse is unrecognizable bludgeoned before we start pointing fingers