Gdggsgs wrote:
Democrats are disgusting wrote:
Democrats are disgusting!!!!!
This is in Texas. Odds are these are republicans,?
Vegas says- No Chance!
Gdggsgs wrote:
Democrats are disgusting wrote:
Democrats are disgusting!!!!!
This is in Texas. Odds are these are republicans,?
Vegas says- No Chance!
##### wrote:
Gdggsgs wrote:
This is in Texas. Odds are these are republicans,?
Vegas says- No Chance!
The dad wasn't republican before, but he rootin-tootin is for sure now.
VroomVroom wrote:
Perhaps wrote:
He might end up gay or something, then we can all agree he was born that way.
? No doubt gay people are born that way. Doesn't mean that a mom should be able to change their son from a boy to a girl. And if they're taking the kids wishes into account, they SHOULDNT BE. Seven year olds don't know sh!t about what they want to do from one minute to the next.
Let the kid grow up the way HE IS then when he's an adult he can do whatever he wants whether he ends up gay or not that doesn't matter.
Texas tho wtffff?!?! I thought they were the one halfway sensible state in the country.
The person who commented that he should kidnap him is right on. Crazy that's what it's come to.
O.K. so , in no way do I agree with the child abuse that has been heaped on this kid. It is more likely he will end up gay even if they leave him alone from now on. The point is , after all this cruelty , if he turns out gay , or just has a nasty sexual orientation crisis, do you really think this situation had nothing to do with it? I am challenging that common notion, and this microscopic toxic petri dish view of tragic child nurture, unfortunately gives us the chance.
There is at least a 95% chance the kid wasn't born gay, according to the born gay theory. The kid wasn't born gay, or female, or to have an extreme sexual identity crisis. Hopefully ,there will be quality help , if there is enough quality help to reverse this sexual identity abuse done to him. Unlikely.
I see the Russian trolls are trying to rile up the extremists again...
Does that mean an election is coming?
I agree and that father should still take his sons and remove them from that poisonous woman until at least 18 years old. As far as I'm concerned she has no genetic connection and theres no reason for her to remain involved.
A big part of the problem here is that the kid won’t keep his/her story straight. She tells her mom and a bunch of shrinks that she’s a girl, then he tells his dad and friends that he’s a boy. If the kid won’t make up his/her mind, how is anyone supposed to know how to handle the situation?
Maybe the kid is just trying to play the parents against each other.
which is it, kid? wrote:
A big part of the problem here is that the kid won’t keep his/her story straight. She tells her mom and a bunch of shrinks that she’s a girl, then he tells his dad and friends that he’s a boy. If the kid won’t make up his/her mind, how is anyone supposed to know how to handle the situation?
Maybe the kid is just trying to play the parents against each other.
The kid is 7. When I was 7 I wanted to be Spider-Man.
No but there is a lot of irony of Ms Kuvalnka, with that hair cut, helps turn boys be girls if their crazy parents will let her.
If the mother in Texas got ahold of her she'd be Mr Kuvalanka in a day.
This is beyond f*cked up. That mother should be convicted and put in jail for what she's doing. No one that age knows how they feel about gender. That kid's whole life is going to be f*cked up now because of this SJW mother making decisions about her kid without him knowing the consequences since he is so young.