rojo wrote:
So this weekend I'm trying to get up to speed on my NCAA xc knowledge and as I was looking for info on Nuttycombe/Pre-Nats, I realized the Penn State National Open was going on as we speak. I clicked on live results and was shocked to see Temple come up as the winning men's team.
What the hell?
I guess it's not that much of a shock as they were ranked ahead of Penn State (but behind Penn) in the regional rankings but when did Temple get decent at xc?
I just looked up last year's results and they were 2nd in the AAC and 6th in their regional. Now it looks like they are 3rd or 4th in the region.
https://results.flotrack.org/XC-PTT.html?mid=1806
Temple should be good. It's generally hard to recruit to an XC only program but Temple has extremely low admissions standards, the cost is cheap,, good location (surrounded by talent) and they have a lot of scholarships (they bring in a lot of internationals). So that balances out recruiting.
Then once you have a bit of talent on the team, being XC only is a huge advantage. They can accumulate a ton of mileage during the winter, spring, and summer. You can stay healthy because you aren't racing 9 months out of the year.
Looks like Temple has 4 seniors in the top 5 so this year is all-or-nothing for them.