I have always been a big Jenny Simpson fan, now, not so much. Her negative comment about her fellow USA teammates at a global championship was unkind, unnecessary and incorrect. If we assume every U.S. athlete who has worked with a tainted coach is a doper, then we would have to cast dispersions on nearly half of our Olympic medalist since the 1980s. Notwithstanding the fact there is actual doping in our sport that need to be called out, but for athletes who put their heart and soul into becoming successful and would never dope, to be called out as a doper is extremely hurtful. - Jenny's comments perhaps makes her a hero to the average LRC member, but to me and lot of people I know, she has placed a stain on her legacy.[/quote]
I am not a fan nor a detractor of Jenny Simpson. I certainly like how she gets after it in races. She sets a good example for everyone in that competitive sense. However, her statement about what running is all about is spot on. I cannot see how anyone would dispute it. Running is not about pharma, it is supposed to be about physical performance. She captures what other competitors are thinking.
So, although Alberto got a rosy review from USADA/WADA about his intent (ie they say there is nothing malicious) he is violating the spirit of competition. Looking for chemical loopholes to get best results from supplements/IVs/etc is less about running and sounds more like doping even if it is not EPO/Testerone/Other banned drugs. Runners ask about training, rest, stretching, weights, etc. Should we now start threads on the chemistry on how to become a champion? If the olympic ideal is physically pure contents, then this strays far from that.