Are you trolling? I can hardly believe you are honestly this stupid. Of course Salazar was found to have committed doping violations. Not once have I disputed that, contrary to your claim that I am "trying to depict Salazar's offending as other than what it was." What you still don't understand (because you still haven't read the report) is that one can commit a doping violation and "orchestrate and facilitate prohibited doping conduct" without promoting doping to his athletes.
"A majority of the Panel finds that no substantial step was taken by Respondent with
respect to an anti-doping rule violation (i.e. the Use of a Prohibited Method/over volume
infusion) for the NOP Athletes and in fact, Respondent was explicit at the time in taking
whatever steps were necessary to avoid any such conduct." (pg. 72)
Does that sound like promoting doping to you?
I'll give you one more chance to defend your position, not because I expect you to produce what I am asking for, but because I want to ensure that anyone who reads this fully understands how much of an idiot you are.
Please illustrate how Salazar promoted doping among his athletes. That's all you have to do to prove your point. If you aren't going to do that, do me (and everyone else who has experienced the mental torture induced by reading your inane ramblings) a favor and stop speaking with authority on subjects that are clearly beyond your comprehension.
The full report, for whenever you decide to abandon your willful ignorance:
https://drive.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=https://www.usada.org/wp-content/uploads/Salazar-AAA-Decision-1.pdf