qw wrote:
I don't support cheaters. It's just I don't see anything to blame Salazar for comparing to rest of the world's stage. WADA has become joke into listing general usage food supplements as banned substances and ensuring national agencies distribute four year bans to everyone.
It's the same story as for climate and nature preservation. While Western world is restricted to use even plastic bags, the entire Asia is dumping billions of metric tons of plastic waste literally right into rivers and oceans daily.
Where's the fair play if parties play by different rules? You really think grounding Salazar will prevent someone in Russia or Africa not to take EPO? Clearly if they see you get same 4 year ban.
I agree. I've had this discussion with a former Olympic athlete (who is clean) a year or two back. It's all about the 50 shades of gray at the top. It's very possible you get a guy like Bolt or Phelps who is a genetic freak. But for the rest, it's taking it as close to the limit as possible.
Is it cheating? I don't know.
I mean, I'll take ibuprofen after a hard day to allow me to do harder workouts. I'll consume protein shakes and vitamin waters to help with recovery. I'll take extra iron during higher mileage times to help with red blood cell counts.
All things that could have a positive effect on my performance vs if I didn't take them, but I'm not banned. If there was an EPO pill or something I could freely buy that wasn't "banned", would I take it to help increase my performance? Probably.
I really can't fault people who want to push their bodies to the legal limits. When you set legal limits like the anti-doping agencies have, they essentially create a ceiling. If you're not at 99% of that ceiling, then you're deficient.