Kevin Hadsell wrote:
That’s all you got. After all that’s been said? Let’s focus on WADA. Let’s point to a cyclist that they allow to compete that’s taking a substance that’s not even banned.
Nice deflection. .
Oh yeah....by the way...how many drugs tests did Frome miss again?
No.
Wada banned 2 riders who had less of the same substance that Frome had in his system. There are permitted guide lines. That is the point. They made an EXCEPTION for Frome due to him having the money and the legal representation that the other riders didn't have. So WADA screwed them, and WADA didn't reverse their ruling on the riders after they made the ruling on Frome.....straight fraud.
So your so called theory of WADA not making exceptions for athletes because they would have to make exceptions for all other athletes just got thrown out the window. That's what you said.
And this is worse than Frome missing a drug test. It's more like he FAILED one due to what amount is permitted! And he got off, which is why the cycling work went ballistic about.
You keep moving the goalpost on all of your arguments.
Christian Coleman was on his way to get tested, not avoiding it, didn't fail a test or over use a legal substance. So hopefully he has some outstanding legal representation, similar to frome, so that he is not banned.
There are too many inconsistencies with WADA, from their testers, to substance limitations, etc. It appears that the rich or richer athletes are able to get off because they can afford legal reps to really get at WADA.
If you want other examples of WADA's bullcrap, then let me know.