Democrats lose again
Democrats lose again
Well, it's time to dial up Michelle O and have her save us from 4 more years of DJT.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2019/08/01/msnbc-lets-michael-moore-rant-12-minutes-need-liberal-nomineeWho can crush Trump? Who is the street fighter? We saw it in Bernie last night. Who is the street fighter that can crush Trump? And frankly, I think there’s a person that could do this, if the election were held today, there is one person that would crush Trump . And she hasn’t announced yet. And her last name rhymes with Obama. In fact, it is Obama. Michelle Obama. Everybody watching this right now knows she is a beloved American and she would go in there and she would beat him. She would beat him in the debates, he wouldn’t be able to bully her, he wouldn’t be able to nickname her and she is beloved.
Mikey moore wrote:
Well, it's time to dial up Michelle O and have her save us from 4 more years of DJT.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2019/08/01/msnbc-lets-michael-moore-rant-12-minutes-need-liberal-nomineeWho can crush Trump? Who is the street fighter? We saw it in Bernie last night. Who is the street fighter that can crush Trump? And frankly, I think there’s a person that could do this, if the election were held today, there is one person that would crush Trump . And she hasn’t announced yet. And her last name rhymes with Obama. In fact, it is Obama. Michelle Obama. Everybody watching this right now knows she is a beloved American and she would go in there and she would beat him. She would beat him in the debates, he wouldn’t be able to bully her, he wouldn’t be able to nickname her and she is beloved.
Oh please. Is that the best the Democratic Party has to offer?
Besides, her husband’s legacy is going down the toilet
Higher, need not be better wrote:
UsedToBeKnowItAll wrote:
The thing that distinguishes Yang is UBI. And to be clear, the Earth isn't just going to explode in 10 years. It will gradually get warmer over the next 100 years, and we'll have to deal with the effects of that. .
Wrong again. Yang explicitly said: "we also need to start moving our people to higher ground". As in soon/now, not 100 years from now
At 3.28mm rise per / year, we'll need to evacuate up 0.33 meters by 2120!
Summary: wrote:
L L wrote:
They need for it too get down to a debate of no more than the top six for it to be worthwhile.
Same night
Biden
Warren
Harris
Sanders
Buttigieg
Booker
Biden: totally confused and/or Incoherent at times. Example: warned against another 8 years of Trump (apparently unaware of term limits).
Warren: Thinks any business with more than 100 employees is too large to manage, yet thinks government should be virtually infinite in size & scope.
Harris: I have no opinion about her. My point: what exactly does she believe in or stand for? I just don't know.....
Sanders: The Crazy uncle who everyone tip-toes around at holiday dinners. ("Careful kids: Uncle Bernie is off his meds!")
Buttigieg: Thinks the planet will self-destruct in 12 years, yet travels by private jet more than any of the other Dem candidates.
Booker: He'd throw his grandmother under a bus to score points in a debate. Particularly against Biden.
One problem both Harris and Warren have in debates is they seem incapable of explaining their past mistakes when confronted. Instead they try to throw it back on the accuser, simplistically saying, “You’re wrong” or “Republican talking points” without any explanation. I think for most viewers, this causes the accusation to stick. Harris especially comes off as petty and mean spirited, trying to paint Biden as a racist for things huge majorities of the senate passed 30 years ago...about the same time she was grinding on Willie Brown’s lap for patronage jobs.
Confused Drum wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
Biden did extremely well.
You should have him join your party of Republicans.
Since when was Obama made into a Republican? Because Biden positions are close to Obama's.
Conondrum wrote:
Conundrum wrote:
I have absolutely no respect any longer Democratic elected officials. They lost any claim of the moral high ground after their total obsequious cave in to Bill Clinton when NOT ONE OF THEM WOULD VOTE TO IMPEACH HIM. DEMOCRATS HAVE NO MORALS!
Totally agree with your statement above Conundrum. How can we as liberals point the finger at Trump and the Republicans when the same thing happened with the Democrats and Bill Clinton. We, meaning me and you, were both ok with them supporting Bill because of his political party which showed that they have no morals to speak of.
To diametrically change the words to miss qu ote someone is very much like a lie.
I bet people can guess who you look up to and support.
Summary: wrote:
L L wrote:
They need for it too get down to a debate of no more than the top six for it to be worthwhile.
Same night
Biden
Warren
Harris
Sanders
Buttigieg
Booker
Biden: totally confused and/or Incoherent at times. Example: warned against another 8 years of Trump (apparently unaware of term limits).
Warren: Thinks any business with more than 100 employees is too large to manage, yet thinks government should be virtually infinite in size & scope.
Harris: I have no opinion about her. My point: what exactly does she believe in or stand for? I just don't know.....
Sanders: The Crazy uncle who everyone tip-toes around at holiday dinners. ("Careful kids: Uncle Bernie is off his meds!")
Buttigieg: Thinks the planet will self-destruct in 12 years, yet travels by private jet more than any of the other Dem candidates.
Booker: He'd throw his grandmother under a bus to score points in a debate. Particularly against Biden.
A funny and somewhat truthful take.
Biden showed his age but in fairness to Joe, he was bombarded by almost everyone constantly and some just had cheap shots. Also he had to do oppositional research on 9 people not just one or two. Harris lost composure when she was attacked only a few times.
He showed the best judgement with the exception of Bennett on wednesday. I hope Bennett makes the next debate.
BBC wrote:
Summary: wrote:
Biden: totally confused and/or Incoherent at times. Example: warned against another 8 years of Trump (apparently unaware of term limits).
Warren: Thinks any business with more than 100 employees is too large to manage, yet thinks government should be virtually infinite in size & scope.
Harris: I have no opinion about her. My point: what exactly does she believe in or stand for? I just don't know.....
Sanders: The Crazy uncle who everyone tip-toes around at holiday dinners. ("Careful kids: Uncle Bernie is off his meds!")
Buttigieg: Thinks the planet will self-destruct in 12 years, yet travels by private jet more than any of the other Dem candidates.
Booker: He'd throw his grandmother under a bus to score points in a debate. Particularly against Biden.
One problem both Harris and Warren have in debates is they seem incapable of explaining their past mistakes when confronted. Instead they try to throw it back on the accuser, simplistically saying, “You’re wrong” or “Republican talking points” without any explanation. I think for most viewers, this causes the accusation to stick. Harris especially comes off as petty and mean spirited, trying to paint Biden as a racist for things huge majorities of the senate passed 30 years ago...about the same time she was grinding on Willie Brown’s lap for patronage jobs.
Warren is genuine, passionate and a great debater. That's what makes her dangerous to the Democratic party. Her ideas will lose a general election.
Harris just wants to win and will flip her positions as needed.
Toss every weirdo and all fringe minority groups (gays, Hollywood, atheists etc) into a big pot, stir them up, and you’ve made the Democratic Party.
If you don't know we a re all in trouble.
Summary: wrote:
Biden: totally confused and/or Incoherent at times.
So he's making an appeal for the cross over Trump vote?
How about just same old common sense. We don’t need another government plan.
Regardless, maybe one other thing we can cram into the next big green deal.
XY wrote:
TAA wrote:
De Blasio doesn't seem like he's actually running for president. His style is really odd.
Agree, he’s so off center NY.
How about a Booker/Warren ticket?
Thats my dream ticket. Care to inquire as to why?
Conundrum wrote:
BBC wrote:
One problem both Harris and Warren have in debates is they seem incapable of explaining their past mistakes when confronted. Instead they try to throw it back on the accuser, simplistically saying, “You’re wrong” or “Republican talking points” without any explanation. I think for most viewers, this causes the accusation to stick. Harris especially comes off as petty and mean spirited, trying to paint Biden as a racist for things huge majorities of the senate passed 30 years ago...about the same time she was grinding on Willie Brown’s lap for patronage jobs.
Warren is genuine, passionate and a great debater. That's what makes her dangerous to the Democratic party. Her ideas will lose a general election.
Harris just wants to win and will flip her positions as needed.
Yes, I agree. Warren is a genuine fraud. Cultural appropriation at its worst.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
XY wrote:
Agree, he’s so off center NY.
How about a Booker/Warren ticket?
Thats my dream ticket. Care to inquire as to why?
Because you want a Trump landslide?
Idjot Parade wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Thats my dream ticket. Care to inquire as to why?
Because you want a Trump landslide?
The resultant landslide would likely be big enough to trigger a tsunami.
Mikey moore wrote:
Well, it's time to dial up Michelle O and have her save us from 4 more years of DJT.
Who can crush Trump? Who is the street fighter? We saw it in Bernie last night. Who is the street fighter that can crush Trump? And frankly, I think there’s a person that could do this, if the election were held today, there is one person that would crush Trump . And she hasn’t announced yet. And her last name rhymes with Obama. In fact, it is Obama. Michelle Obama. Everybody watching this right now knows she is a beloved American and she would go in there and she would beat him. She would beat him in the debates, he wouldn’t be able to bully her, he wouldn’t be able to nickname her and she is beloved.
Yep, when I'm denying I'm running ("zero chance"), I talk too... a 12-yo "journalist" from Amtrak's The National magazine??!
Stable of Genius wrote:
Summary: wrote:
Biden: totally confused and/or Incoherent at times.
So he's making an appeal for the cross over Trump vote?
Biden may have showed some age but that old guy is tough. He was bombarded for over two hours from people who had oppositional research and worked to develop their snarky sound bites against him that they figured would get news coverage. That was trial by fire and much worse than any one on one debate against trump could be.
But Trump seems to be deteriorating quickly himself. Increasingly he can't say common words. I wonder if he has a hidden medical problem. Trump would not have been able to handle what Biden handled.