StagnantDynamo wrote:
https://cyclingtips.com/2019/07/mike-woods-the-first-man-to-run-a-sub-4-minute-mile-and-finish-the-tour-de-france/The UMich alum and former teammate of Nick Willis is set to become the first ever sub-4 miler and TDF finisher.
On that note: how many of today’s current distance runners could finish the Tour given, say, a year of cycling training? Who? Could any (Kipchoge, Farah, Rupp?) contend for top 10/3 in the GC?
In a year? No. No chance. Maybe they could, MAYBE, get through the tour and not miss time cuts. But that would be like 1 in 20 odds at best.
In two or three years? Yea, they could have the fitness to contend, IF it translated over to the bike well (it often does, but not for everyone). The biggest aspect is building the overall volume and fatigue resistance to do efforts over and over. That takes years to build up. On block of 3-6 months doing 30 hours a week doesn't give you the endurance to keep smashing it 4 climbs in to a 180km climbing stage in week 3 of the tour.
The other big, and critical factor, is learning how to race and handle bikes in the peleton. Wasted energy, crashing, not knowing how to position, descending, etc. are all critical skills...and you can be the fittest guy in the race and get outright dropped if you're deficient enough. These skills, especially riding in the peleton and positioning , don't come in a year. They usually take many years, and the ones that have them the best are the ones that have been racing since junior days.
Mike Woods is a good example. Within a year or two he was doing single climb efforts at pro level powers. But it took several years to actually be able to race at WT level, and even longer to get good results. Why? Lack of bike handling and lack of ability to produce 6 w/kg 5 hours into a race. Even now, if Woods has one weakness, it's his admit weaker bike handling and positioning. He just doesn't have the same skills and ability as most the these guys that have been racing since they were 10.