Mainstream media burying Ortiz details

OK, I'll bite. The sources for the WMD's accusation were the Bush administration including a presentation by Colin Powell to the United Nations and, reluctantly, the CIA. Or maybe my memory has gone bad and the invasion was triggered by an article in the Daily Mail.

I see now.

Because the government says so, it is responsible for the MSM to push the narrative without question.

Really?

What's more credible?

1. Iraq had WMD and had to be attacked.

2. Assad gassed his own people after Obama said that would be the redline.

3. Trump is a Russian puppet and there is a video of him being peed on in Moscow.

4. Ortiz was shot over a woman.

I cee now wrote:

OK, I'll bite. The sources for the WMD's accusation were the Bush administration including a presentation by Colin Powell to the United Nations and, reluctantly, the CIA. Or maybe my memory has gone bad and the invasion was triggered by an article in the Daily Mail.

I see now.

Because the government says so, it is responsible for the MSM to push the narrative without question.

Really?

What's more credible?

1. Iraq had WMD and had to be attacked.

2. Assad gassed his own people after Obama said that would be the redline.

3. Trump is a Russian puppet and there is a video of him being peed on in Moscow.

4. Ortiz was shot over a woman.

Fox News, conservative politicians and patriotism pushed the pro Iraq war more than anyone. It was all about 9/11 if you remember correctly, except it wasn’t.

I cee now wrote:

OK, I'll bite. The sources for the WMD's accusation were the Bush administration including a presentation by Colin Powell to the United Nations and, reluctantly, the CIA. Or maybe my memory has gone bad and the invasion was triggered by an article in the Daily Mail.

I see now.

Because the government says so, it is responsible for the MSM to push the narrative without question.

Really?

What's more credible?

1. Iraq had WMD and had to be attacked.

2. Assad gassed his own people after Obama said that would be the redline.

3. Trump is a Russian puppet and there is a video of him being peed on in Moscow.

4. Ortiz was shot over a woman.

It would be inappropriate for the media to run with an unverified story about about Ortiz. If it turned out it was false and a newspaper was sued, "But we thought it was true" would not be a good defense.

You could prove me wrong with a "What about Hillary?" analogy.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

[quote]I cee now wrote:

OK, I'll bite. The sources for the WMD's accusation were the Bush administration including a presentation by Colin Powell to the United Nations and, reluctantly, the CIA. Or maybe my memory has gone bad and the invasion was triggered by an article in the Daily Mail.

I see now.

Because the government says so, it is responsible for the MSM to push the narrative without question.

Really?

What's more credible?

1. Iraq had WMD and had to be attacked.

2. Assad gassed his own people after Obama said that would be the redline.

3. Trump is a Russian puppet and there is a video of him being peed on in Moscow.

4. Ortiz was shot over a woman.

It would be inappropriate for the media to run with an unverified story about about Ortiz. If it turned out it was false and a newspaper was sued, "But we thought it was true" would not be a good defense.

Yet they did push those first three stories which were not only unverified but false and obviously so to anyone paying attention.

I suspect you still believe them.

[quote]SDSU Aztec wrote:

It would be inappropriate for the media to run with an unverified story about about Ortiz. If it turned out it was false and a newspaper was sued, "But we thought it was true" would not be a good defense.

Love this guy.

The MSM has been caught time and time again in and out lies and he still thinks they care about journalistic integrity

Will Wanka wrote:

[quote]SDSU Aztec wrote:

It would be inappropriate for the media to run with an unverified story about about Ortiz. If it turned out it was false and a newspaper was sued, "But we thought it was true" would not be a good defense.

Love this guy.

The MSM has been caught time and time again in and out lies and he still thinks they care about journalistic integrity

One of the analogies given to support printing the Ortiz rumour is the false WMD's accusations. But the source for one was the U.S. government and for the other, the Daily Mail. Is that apples to apples for you?

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Will Wanka wrote:

Love this guy.

The MSM has been caught time and time again in and out lies and he still thinks they care about journalistic integrity

One of the analogies given to support printing the Ortiz rumour is the false WMD's accusations. But the source for one was the U.S. government and for the other, the Daily Mail. Is that apples to apples for you?

^^

Yes, I'm so angry with the mainstream media. Wait what am I supposed to be angry about again? I need Russian disinformation campaigns to tell me what I should be angry about. Let me see what some random bots on twitter have to say and I'll get back to you.

MSM sux wrote:

Reports are that Big Papi was shot over a presumed dalliance with another man's wife.

That man being a high up drug dealer who hired two guys -- cops -- to do the hit.

Daily Mail in London carried it first and now it is in the NY Post.

Yet not a peep about this in mainstream media. Do they think they can bury this after the cat is out of the bag?

Maybe. Still running with the phony Russian collusion story.

Hell. The Brojos may bury this.

The official narrative is Papi is a hero period, and then must mention the Boston marathon bombing (the evil Islam angle)/

The one who sux is you. MSM outlets have already confirmed there are rumors as to why this hit was ordered, but they haven't reported on it yet because right now they are still rumors. Also, the MSM didn't run a phony collusion story. Collusion happened, and the MSM was reporting on the investigation into that. Mueller determined there was not enough evidence to pursue criminal conspiracy charges. Go read a book.

love the putin wrote:

Yes, I'm so angry with the mainstream media. Wait what am I supposed to be angry about again? I need Russian disinformation campaigns to tell me what I should be angry about. Let me see what some random bots on twitter have to say and I'll get back to you.

This guy believes in the Russian disinformation campaign narrative.

And the integrity of our media as well.

God help us all.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

One of the analogies given to support printing the Ortiz rumour is the false WMD's accusations. But the source for one was the U.S. government and for the other, the Daily Mail. Is that apples to apples for you?

The Daily Mail is far more credible than the US government.

SomeoneWhoKnows wrote:

Also, the MSM didn't run a phony collusion story. Collusion happened, and the MSM was reporting on the investigation into that. Mueller determined there was not enough evidence to pursue criminal conspiracy charges. Go read a book.

Sorry. No collusion.

Had there been, we would have been told about it.

Over and over again.

I am appalled at how gullible you are.

The powers that be lie to us time and time again and you ask for more

I’m just glad they pictured one of the perps. Bystanders tuned him up good, and he sang perfectly in key after that.

jesseriley wrote:

I’m just glad they pictured one of the perps. Bystanders tuned him up good, and he sang perfectly in key after that.

Unfortunately it is possible the guy they assaulted is an innocent taxi driver (they use motorcycle taxis in the DR).

Well, he certainly didn’t need 2 surgeries & a 1000-mile medivac & a stay in ICU. For playing baseball.

jesseriley wrote:

Well, he certainly didn’t need 2 surgeries & a 1000-mile medivac & a stay in ICU. For playing baseball.

Well I guess it's fine then.

Plus the accusations

jesseriley wrote:

Plus the accusations

Looks like the MSM has concocted their official conspiracy theory cover story.

Globe reporting the attack may have been planned in jail. Don't know if they are giving a motive yet. I will read their story and see.

Anything but the truth.

Lookz like wrote:

jesseriley wrote:

Plus the accusations

Looks like the MSM has concocted their official conspiracy theory cover story.

Globe reporting the attack may have been planned in jail. Don't know if they are giving a motive yet. I will read their story and see.

Anything but the truth.

Another several page detailed story in the Boston Globe on Saturday on the Big Papi story and still nobody knows who ordered this apparent massive conspiracy with nine indictments of what the motive could possibly be.