Mainstream media burying Ortiz details

SDSU Aztec wrote:

I skimmed through several articles posted by Breitbart about the Ortiz shooting and this was the only comment regarding motive:

"The motive of the shooting is not known. Nor is it known who may have ordered it."

Breitbart is part of the MSM agenda! Who would have thunk it?

So you find yet an other source that claims nobody knows the motive and this is your proof that the MSM is not burying that aspect of the story?

WTF?

Just admit it. You are wrong. The media is burying it.

Newspapers reporting six arrests in Big Papi shooting.

They just don't know who ordered it or why?

Repeat the narrative the Dominican is a dangerous place.

MSM continues to expose itself/

Double Huh wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

I skimmed through several articles posted by Breitbart about the Ortiz shooting and this was the only comment regarding motive:

"The motive of the shooting is not known. Nor is it known who may have ordered it."

Breitbart is part of the MSM agenda! Who would have thunk it?

So you find yet an other source that claims nobody knows the motive and this is your proof that the MSM is not burying that aspect of the story?

WTF?

Just admit it. You are wrong. The media is burying it.

The title of the thread refers to "mainstream media", but you used the term "media". It's hard to believe that the entire media has an agenda to protect Ortiz. If you were an editor at a legitimate paper would you really approve a "drug lord" story even though the police have not disclosed a motive and the only source is the Daily Mail?

It's really bizarre that media wouldn't report on unsubstantiated rumors! They must be "burying" them!

I’m sure dopers will claim their honor made them shoot Ortiz; it couldn’t be because they’re high or criminally insane.

OPknuckledragger wrote:

It's really bizarre that media wouldn't report on unsubstantiated rumors! They must be "burying" them!

The MSM has used false and unsubstantiated rumors to sell several wars (Iraq, Syria come to mind and they are pushing for one with Iran) as well as regime change (Venezuela) and you think they are burying the Ortiz was shot over a woman story because they are cautious and ethical!

What will it take for you to open your eyes?

Wowie Zowie wrote:

OPknuckledragger wrote:

It's really bizarre that media wouldn't report on unsubstantiated rumors! They must be "burying" them!

The MSM has used false and unsubstantiated rumors to sell several wars (Iraq, Syria come to mind and they are pushing for one with Iran) as well as regime change (Venezuela) and you think they are burying the Ortiz was shot over a woman story because they are cautious and ethical!

What will it take for you to open your eyes?

That's right! Not reporting unsubstantiated rumors is the definition of "burying"! I'm the most smartest!

[quote]SDSU Aztec wrote:

It's hard to believe that the entire media has an agenda to protect Ortiz.

Is it really?

They don't care about Ortiz. They are protecting their own interests and they are invested in Ortiz being a hero.

You do realize that nearly all the media is owned by a relative handful of like minded Oligarchs?

You find it hard to believe they have an agenda?

Did they not all go along with the lies to march us into war in Iraq?

Did they not all smear that kid in the M%GA hat incident? Note that Letsrun won't post the comment if I don't used the % symbol instead of the A in that word...and you don't think there is man agenda even on this little site?

Do you not find it the least bit odd that there is no mention of the woman angle at all in the MSM?

OPknuckledragger wrote:

It's really bizarre that media wouldn't report on unsubstantiated rumors! They must be "burying" them!

They all seem to have no issue with portraying the DR as a very violent place -- implying Papi just got caught up in the violence for no known reason.

How responsible is that?

No probs wrote:

OPknuckledragger wrote:

It's really bizarre that media wouldn't report on unsubstantiated rumors! They must be "burying" them!

They all seem to have no issue with portraying the DR as a very violent place -- implying Papi just got caught up in the violence for no known reason.

How responsible is that?

Good job doing what the OP wants the media to do - making something up!

OPknuckledragger wrote:

Wowie Zowie wrote:

The MSM has used false and unsubstantiated rumors to sell several wars (Iraq, Syria come to mind and they are pushing for one with Iran) as well as regime change (Venezuela) and you think they are burying the Ortiz was shot over a woman story because they are cautious and ethical!

What will it take for you to open your eyes?

That's right! Not reporting unsubstantiated rumors is the definition of "burying"! I'm the most smartest!

Did you miss the part where they pushed unsubstantiated rumors and flat out lies to push wars? Yes, you are not the smartest. They keep lying and you keep defending them.

OPknuckledragger wrote:

Good job doing what the OP wants the media to do - making something up!

Now you think the other woman story is just made up?

It's much easier to repeatedly fool a fool than it is to get him to admit he has been fooled.

Those bastards!

SDSU Aztec wrote:

[quote]enter here wrote:

[quote]SDSU Aztec wrote:

Did they not all go along with the lies to march us into war in Iraq?

Those bastards!

Wow. You defend the people who lied to sell a war to the American public?

Just so you don't have to admit you are wrong?

How many times wrote:

OPknuckledragger wrote:

That's right! Not reporting unsubstantiated rumors is the definition of "burying"! I'm the most smartest!

Did you miss the part where they pushed unsubstantiated rumors and flat out lies to push wars? Yes, you are not the smartest. They keep lying and you keep defending them.

Exactly! And instead of applauding them when they don't push unsubstantiated rumors, we should chastise them when they don't! Brilliant!

U doubt they are wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

[quote]enter here wrote:

[quote]SDSU Aztec wrote:

Did they not all go along with the lies to march us into war in Iraq?

Those bastards!

Wow. You defend the people who lied to sell a war to the American public?

Just so you don't have to admit you are wrong?

Uh, the thread is about Ortiz and not the Iraqi war.

SDSU Aztec wrote:

U doubt they are wrote:

Wow. You defend the people who lied to sell a war to the American public?

Just so you don't have to admit you are wrong?

Uh, the thread is about Ortiz and not the Iraqi war.

Uh, your whole argument is based on the view that the MSM is being responsible by not talking about the woman angle with Papi yet this is false as it ignores the reality that the MSM lies and prints unsubstantiated rumors all the time if it fits their agenda with Iraq War being an example of that.

Now its made up wrote:

OPknuckledragger wrote:

Good job doing what the OP wants the media to do - making something up!

Now you think the other woman story is just made up?

It's much easier to repeatedly fool a fool than it is to get him to admit he has been fooled.

Good job on not correctly comprehending what I said was made up! Reading is overrated!

Uh your point wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Uh, the thread is about Ortiz and not the Iraqi war.

Uh, your whole argument is based on the view that the MSM is being responsible by not talking about the woman angle with Papi yet this is false as it ignores the reality that the MSM lies and prints unsubstantiated rumors all the time if it fits their agenda with Iraq War being an example of that.

OK, I'll bite. The sources for the WMD's accusation were the Bush administration including a presentation by Colin Powell to the United Nations and, reluctantly, the CIA. Or maybe my memory has gone bad and the invasion was triggered by an article in the Daily Mail.