El stupido wrote:
There is a crucial aspect of the discussion that you fail to mention...the athletes he coaches and their respective levels of talent. From what I can recall, not many of them ran exceptionally fast in high school. Obviously that is not to say that they don’t have talent, but a collegiate program doesn’t just blossom into a powerhouse in a few years; there are ups and downs, as there are in nearly all processes worth patience. And didn’t he coach a superstar a couple years back?? I know that’s only a sample size of 1, but cmon you’ve got to look at things more pragmatically.
Hating on magness for something as trivial as this makes hating on Wetmore for not producing sub 14 guys at Seton Hall seem more sane.
In summary, you are a fool.
A huge part of the coach's job is to recruit. If he doesn't have enough talent on his team, it's his own fault. He's been there since 2012, he's had plenty of time build to a strong team.
He actually has some pretty talented guys on his team. They just don't develop. He makes his 400/800 runner (49/1:53 in high school) do cross country and the kid got slower this year in the 800. His top 5k runner this year (14:41 ran a 15:19 legit 5k in XC in high school. That's horrible development for a guy who stayed 5 years.
Magness is constantly telling people how smart he is. He does podcasts, has a twitter comment about everything, and writes books that just regurgitate decades old science. For someone as arrogant as Magness, it's fair for us to criticize his lack of results. All I'm saying is produce some results before asking me to spend 30 dollars on your book.
He did just coach one of the best steeplechasers in the NCAA (the kid who fell at nationals) but wasn't able to use that success to bring in more steeplechasers. If you're not able to bring in strong recruiting classes after that, then you are a terrible, horrible, crappy recruiter.