I’ve got it, “Guinness” must be an anonymous troll.
I’ve got it, “Guinness” must be an anonymous troll.
Guinness may be hard to smear as “sowing discord,” since it was founded as an authority to settle disputes, dumb@sses.
jesseriley wrote:
Exactly, you lied, because all I did was ask for the accountability that Guinness actually requires (such as non-anonymous records, which we still don’t have). Everyone argued about whether Proctor was ahead/behind pace; we proved he was behind by consulting the original (verified by Guinness) record, using the TOWN names.
You don’t know what you are talking about, 4Z.
What did I lie about?
jesseriley wrote:
Exactly, you lied, because all I did was ask for the accountability that Guinness actually requires (such as non-anonymous records, which we still don’t have). Everyone argued about whether Proctor was ahead/behind pace; we proved he was behind by consulting the original (verified by Guinness) record, using the TOWN names.
You don’t know what you are talking about, 4Z.
And you think I read more of that thread than I did, because I don't know what you are talking about with Guinness towns, etc. I read it like the Trump threads - peak in once in a while to see what is going on, but miss 90+% of the action.
That’s right, you’re a troll.
jesseriley wrote:
That’s right, you’re a troll.
How is that? And what did I lie about?
I’m using your definition, in case you read it...
Rojo asked how far behind Proctor was, I said it depends how long he lives! Currently almost a year...
This is odd wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
It’s true no one needs my approval.
But if they are interested in transcons, no one really has my experience.
I notice that, in between insults, you ask questions that you think are unanswerable, but for me it is familiar territory. Who knows, it may help someone, Proctor didn’t invent these type of runs.
Again, just more vague accusations yet not a shred of proof. It’s why your accusations were ignored by most. You come across as a bit unhinged.
And no one is accusing Terry Fox or Al Howie of anything. You are the only one throwing around unfounded accusations.
A bit unhinged?
This door hasn't a chance in hell of closing ever again.
I would suggest using buckles instead, you know, the kind used in straight jackets.
The asylum is full of people crazy enough to think they can take Al’s record. “I coulda been a contender!...”
jesseriley wrote:
Another issue was that Proctor officially quit right after receiving a $50,000 donation. If there was an incentive, for instance, to make it a certain distance/capital city before receiving donations, it would be a powerful temptation to cheat or prolong the event by taking drugs, etc. That’s my concern.
It certainly looked, by Regina, that it was no longer a real run, yet he straggled into Winnipeg well behind schedule. Simultaneously it seemed like Proctor had no interest in actually continuing to the finish.
Jessie my concern is that your prolonged use of drugs has caused you to lost touch with reality.
Running across Canada ??, at a record pace, without a single good multiday? THAT is crazy...
Interesting day. Non-trolls, apparently, are people who have no feelings whatsoever about the people & subjects they post about, as well as no knowledge.
It’s actually the anonymous posters who are non-trolls (I was confused about this). Non-trolls don’t remember anything they’ve ever posted and resent being reminded of it. Non-trolls never read, even the articles they post themselves, or their own posts. Non-trolls realize everything they post is true, unless they change their minds later, unless they don’t have a mind.
Non-trolls are inspired by events that never happened and are, in fact, impossible. Non-trolls believe time & space & other myths present no obstacle. “Just go there,” (Manitoba, in this case), is a reasonable suggestion; even though I’ve already run more of Manitoba than Proctor. I’m guessing they believe you just google it & you’re there.
I’m starting to understand all the guests on my thread. They’re non-trolls!
Not sure if Six Days/Dome is ever going to happen for Proctor, both his multidays he’s quit early, but so far I’m pleased that we’ve had more time to address the chaotic issues of last summer. Especially, we’ve had conversations among the posters.
jesseriley wrote:
Your telling me? You know I personally wrote all that, don’t you?
A 3:39 marathoner claiming to run 2:59+ in a marathon with zero results to back it up wrote that? You're like, amazing!!!!!
The Frank Meza cheating affair that’s being covered wall-to-wall on another thread fascinates me. All the evidence in the world, yet his people are still trying to threaten & silence everyone.
At least we’re learning every trick in the cheaters’ playbook.
Meanwhile, looking at the Sage Canaday thread (after Sage improved his time from 2015, which the trolls regarded as some sort of disaster), we’ve got some work to do educate these clowns when multiday is almost unknown anyway.
And they didn’t even bring GPS into it, ha ha.
Another unpopular point I made regarding the cheater Meza, is that cheaters who fool enough people become untouchable. This certainly seemed to be the case after Proctor quit last year, with the insistence, straight through to the present, that we cease investigating & should somehow never revisit the issue.
I also enjoy drawing parallels between Trump’s scams & the Proctor affair. For instance, the favorable news from Global News during the run last year (some of it seemed paid for), yet no resources spent on a written log or a coach, far more critical to success as a run.
I thought from the start it resembled a publicity stunt or reality TV more than a serious run.
Another suspicious aspect of posts related to multiday is the constant elevation of Internet protocol or technology above simply putting one foot in front of the other.
If you can’t do it in a race, you probably can’t do it across Canada ??, no matter the GPS or your definition of a troll. Those are just attempts at deflection.