Robert, I can accept that many athletes use doping, some of them of top level. THIS IS A FACT.
People in LR, instead, dont't accept that is possible to achieve a WR WITHOUT using doping, because they have this opinion, something that for me is not an opinion, BUT ANOTHER FACT.
About doping, the most part of thread are based on the BELLY, not on FACTS.
We go to see some of the most important athletes doped :
RITA JEPTOO :
a) She was positive two weeks before winning Chicago 2014. This is a FACT.
b) After this, she was banned for "supposed" irregularities in the BP before Boston, because it was not ethic to consider a doper as winner of the jackpot. IF THERE WAS NOT THE POSITIVE TEST BEFORE CHICAGO, THE FLUCTUATIONS IN HER BP NEVER COULD PRODUCE A VERDICT OF BAN, only some suspicion (like the list of the British newspaper).
c) Because of the FACT she was doped in September 2014, the most part of readers think she was doped also 3 or 5 or 7 years before (when already was able running under 2:20). THIS IS NOT A FACT, BUT A SUPPOSITION.
MATHEW KISORIO :
a) He was positive in a control in competition after National Championships 2012 in 10000 on track (14.06). THIS IS A FACT.
b) There was a widespread opinion that in Kenya there were not antidoping controls. THIS WAS AN OPINION, looking at the FACT that Kisorio was positive during a doping control IN KENYA.
c) Instead, is a FACT that there were not OOC tests for blood, while is a FACT that there were a lot of OOC tests for urine.
d) Is a FACT that the National Champs 2012, where Kisorio was doped, WAS ONE OF THE SLOWEST COMPETITION ON TRACK OF THE ATHLETES ON THE DISTANCE (8th personal performance, very far from both the PB at sea level of 26'54"25 and the PB in Nairobi with 27'28"13, while in 2012 he ran in 28'05"60).
e) Is a FACT that, after coming back from the ban, Kisorio was able running his best marathons, lowing his PB from 2:10:58 to 2:04:53.
f) Is a FACT that banned athletes, for coming back, have to be tested frequently, normally 3 times more than athletes never having some doping problem previously (so, we have to suppose he was clean AFTER the ban).
I can continue with examples like this for other 50 athletes.
I'm sure some top athlete, till now clean, can be on doping, and till now was not still caught.
But, also, I KNOW FOR SURE that many top are completely clean, some of them being WR holder, and automatically this means that the idea of 4% of improvement using EPO, at that level, is a total bullshit.
So, till when the obfuscated believers in DOPING continue to look at pseudo scientific tests, carried out with a population that nothing has to do with elite athletes, speaking about amazing possibilitires of improvement with EPO, and are not able to ACCEPT the FACT that several WR are clean, I can't have any interest to post again something about doping.
But always I go to defend athletes that I know are clean, and NEVER I can accept calumnies regarding their integrity.
This is my world, I know what I'm talking about, and I don't think is the world of many posters, who show very good knowledge, but for something else.