old shoe wrote:
Plus this puts her back on the map for other sponsorship opportunities.
She could sell walkers to old folks with that stride.
old shoe wrote:
Plus this puts her back on the map for other sponsorship opportunities.
She could sell walkers to old folks with that stride.
TTH wrote:
Nature wins wrote:
I'm guessing that she had to revolve her classes around NOP workouts and had little time to get involved in anything on campus or meet anyone. On a D1 team, you have a built in social network of teammates who have the same schedule as you do.
So from a running standpoint it's ideal but at 18, no social network is tough.
Eureka!
The LetsRun board is proven to have at least one coherent parent prospect.
If that was the only issue she could return now that she is well into her adult years.
Follow the thread and you might learn something. I clearly stated it was a much better situation and not the same. URAFM.
SDSU Aztec wrote:
TTH wrote:
.....and not competing at a world class level.
Huh? I have to hate life to run at a world class level?
Another one with zero comprehension ability.
It wasn't an age thing wrote:
TTH wrote:
Eureka!
The LetsRun board is proven to have at least one coherent parent prospect.
If that was the only issue she could return now that she is well into her adult years.
It likely wasn't the only issue however circumstances have certainly changed and simply revisiting the plan at age 18 now that she is (I think) 23 just wouldn't make sense.
bleu wrote:
Follow the thread and you might learn something. I clearly stated it was a much better situation and not the same. URAFM.
That only makes you more wrong. Get a clue.