First, I will say that you have disrespectfully attempted to control the conversation and steer it in the direction of your choosing, apparently without having read my previous posts. You have tried to make it about my character, and have ignored the actual topics under discussion, namely honest and fair competition, and Semenya's role therein.
Even at that, I will engage the discussion, although I will use the original topics as a touchstone. Because apparently I have to make it explicit, that is being respectful of you, to a very high degree--however, I do not respect your tactic of attempting to change the subject.
I will start with point #3, because it is the most important point here, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with Semenya or fair competition, which are the actual topics of discussion. If what you said is true, then out of respect for the Brojos and their property which is this site, I will of course stop immediately. I had no idea, and I will wait to hear from the Brojos themselves. The Brojos have earned that respect--they started and continue to run the site, and provide value to users like us.
Point #2: there is a difference between being respectful TO [OF] people, and being respectful OF THEIR ACTIONS. You are confusing the two. At the moment, I am being respectful of yourself, someone with whom I apparently disagree. I have also been respectful of Semenya, in that I entertain this discussion at all, and in that everything I say is based on evidence, and not on some irrational motive I may have, or any baseless or dishonorable negative feelings I may have for Semenya.
I will say it again, for the last time--I don't know Semenya personally, and all I am commenting on is his participation in organized competitive track. He may have plenty of good qualities, and he might actually be someone I would enjoy hanging out with, I have no idea. But this is a track board, and a track thread. No matter how much you seem to want to make it so, this discussion is not about the psychosexual qualities of transgenderism or gender identity--it is about track and field, which is a competitive sport. I reject your attempt to hijack the discussion.
And by referring to me as "childish", you are making a character assessment based on observed actions and comments--which makes you a hypocrite, because you don't accept my doing the same thing. By your actions, you have validated my own. It was inevitable, because as humans, we observe, interpret, analyze, conclude, communicate, we cognate. It could be no other way.
Point #1: First of all, Semenya has stated himself that he is not "hurt". From the Sunday Times: "A confident Caster said that mean comments about her don't hurt her feelings because she knows who she is. "Being the way I am is good. It's God. I cannot question God. When I wake up I tell myself I like myself the way I am."" For you to purport to speak on behalf of Semenya is pretentious and arrogant, and apparently you have misrepresented him, at that.
You seem very ego-centric, in that rather than considering the content of what I have written and the qualifiers that I have supplied with it, you are almost exclusively concerned with its effect on you personally, on your own values and probably self-construct. You are seeing what you wish to see, and it is all personal. I do not purport to tell Semenya how to self-identify, something which he does fine himself. It is you who are the controlling one here, not myself or Semenya, who has stated that "I know how I look like. I know how I sound. I know how I walk. I walk the talk. I'm a woman of my actions. I'm just gonna be me. I do me and you do you." While I am letting "you do you" and even respecting it by discussing it with you, I will say that it is uninteresting. There are plenty of more interesting things about this situation, like all of the innocent women athletes who have been harmed by Semenya's actions and by the glacial pace of a self-interested bureaucracy--women about whom you haven't even deigned to comment, which is telling.
Why do I refer to Semenya as "he"? Because use of language is a critical and sometimes subtle tool that is often used to frame the limits of the debate--or in this case, to re-frame the limits of the debate, or to re-characterize the debate. The issue here is fairness of competition within 2 broad categories of ability, which categories have historically been associated with a binary gender delineation referred to as "male" and "female". This is the language of the debate, and has certainly not been the last word, for there have been plenty of intersex, high-T, XXY, etc. people in sports for a long time.
The language of the debate articulates the foundation of the issue. For purposes of this issue, Semenya has been determined, not only by myself but by impartial arbitrators, to be in the "male" category. To refer to Semenya in the context of this issue by using a female pronoun is a subtle way in which to express your rejection of the determination. I do not reject that determination, I applaud it as correct, and refer to Semenya as male to preserve the decision and its process, the legitimacy of which you try to undermine via your use of the feminine.
Nor in my opinion is his "male-ness" restricted to the restricted events. T level is one thing, developmental physiology is another. I consider him to be male for all athletic purposes, regardless of his T level, and will refer to him appropriately.
Once again, I do not believe that Semenya's actions in this matter have been praiseworthy, laudable, honorable, or even harmless. If Semenya has anywhere near normal cognitive ability and is not a sociopath, then he has always understood that his actions were unfair, and were injuring innocent third parties, yet continued out of a selfish desire for personal gain. When you jog to a huge victory, you are either an idiot or an a-hole if you don't realize that something is wrong with what you just did. I have chosen to believe that of these two, he is mostly an a-hole, because he seems normally articulate. Although his harmful and selfish actions were temporarily permitted by regulators, that is no longer the case, at least at those distances at which his performances are likely to continue to cause ongoing harm.
If you wish to have a discussion about something other than fairness of competition or Semenya's role therein, you can go somewhere else, or start a new thread. I reject your attempt to change the discussion to one of gender self-identification.