Despite all the unworthy children and grandchildren of alumni and the superwealthy haunting the halls of the Ivies and Stanford, the fact is that the standards are incredibly high for admission, because the quality of applicants is extremely high. Maybe the SAT numbers today are hard to compare with the past because of various changes but we're talking about classes that could be entirely composed of valedictorians, National Merit Scholars, and single-subject specialists of national or international renown, and the general averages are 1500 and up at the top schools. At state schools, the material taught is often the same but the standards for an A or B are far, far lower, and many teachers just give multiple choice exams, many nowadays being mostly online quizzes where cheating is rampant and the questions themselves are simple enough that any educated person could do very well on them without taking the course.
I am very pleased to see Ratcliffe running 13:32, only three seconds back of Fisher. He nearly broke 4 in high school, ran some insane time his first xc race, low 23, and then had disappeared for years with injuries. Now he's a genuine threat to hit the Olympic standard next year. Er ... hit the old Olympic standard (was typically around 13:20-22). The new one is 13:13.5 and that would take some work to get to. But great to see him back and to see their athletes healthy and running well again.
If they don't, oh well, they still get in on the ground floor of future unicorns.