Wake up guy wrote:
How many people do you know that pay at tax time? Almost nobody. So eliminating the penalty wouldn't change the fact that people are dumb and they think receiving a refund is a god thing.
Eliminating the penalty would mean that the disciplined among us, and those who don't live paycheck to paycheck, would make it so nothing is withheld from their check. At this time of year, you would then owe whatever you owe.
But over the course of the year, the government would have no money.
People tell me all the time that "You know you are giving the government a NO-INTEREST loan?" I get about $4000 withheld for FEDERAL, so if NONE of that was withheld, I would have $2000 average over the year. Right now I have ALLY DEMAND NOTES earning 2.25%. So I would have $45 in interest that I don't have now.
I never am broke and have $125,000 in my IMMA right now, so having that little bit NOT withheld would change nothing for me. I enjoy getting an $8000-10,000 check around February every year. I put $6500 (over 6 months) in a ROTH IRA and put the rest into a mutual fund.
Because of the HOMESTEAD Property Tax Relief act I would get $1500 back as well as about $2000 in tax credits if I had ZERO withheld from my check.
Your situation (and most of America's) is not like mine. You don't have $125,000 liquid, and you prob aren't putting $6500 in a ROTH, your house is prob not paid off, and you are probably not looking at a $3500 refund if you withhold NOTHING and $9000 if you claim the real amount of exemptions.
You may be doing better than me, you probably are, but that does not mean that it is universally best to withhold NOTHING in order to earn $45 in interest over one year.