You are insane. Have a Snickers.
You are insane. Have a Snickers.
“Still mad at zinc, Billy?”
YMMV wrote:
One thing is for sure, if you get all of your information from mainstream media, you will get the results that every one else is getting. Which, in my country anyway, is of a very low standard and personally unacceptable. Just take a look at pictures of random people in the U.S. from the 40s, 50s and '60s, compared to teh general public today. Something very wrong happened with food and diet in the '70s and the result is the Tsunami of obesity and health dysfunction we see today.
What were the folks eating and doing right in 40s, 50s and 60s? What changed so drastically in the 70s?
As a youngster growing up in the 60s, I spent a lot of time with my grandparents as all four lived in the same town with my family. For breakfast they ate a lot of bacon & eggs, toast, pancakes, pastries & drank O.J. & tons of coffee. Lunches were sandwiches with lunchmeat, potatos, pasta & more coffee. Dinners were steaks, hamburgers, pasta, potatoes, baked bread & more coffee. Deserts were ice cream or pastries.
One of my grandfathers loved his stogies & a good glass of wine before bed. None of them were overweight, none of them needed prescription meds, none of them ran or workout at a gym; though all of them walked virtually everyday.
All four lived into their very late 80s/early 90s dying of natural causes at home with the exception of one grandmother who was nursing home bound for the last five yrs of her life due to glaucoma & dementia. Their diets were composed of a wide variety of foods but had fair amount of "carbs" - certainly something you wouldn't endorse.
Let's Get To The Bottom Of This wrote:
As a youngster growing up in the 60s, I spent a lot of time with my grandparents as all four lived in the same town with my family. For breakfast they ate a lot of bacon & eggs, toast, pancakes, pastries & drank O.J. & tons of coffee. Lunches were sandwiches with lunchmeat, potatos, pasta & more coffee. Dinners were steaks, hamburgers, pasta, potatoes, baked bread & more coffee. Deserts were ice cream or pastries.
Ditto.
The macronutrient % in the US diet has not really changed. Today people just eat more, snack more, and cook less at home (women in the workforce may be the biggest factor in all this).
same old same old wrote:
The macronutrient % in the US diet has not really changed. Today people just eat more, snack more, and cook less at home (women in the workforce may be the biggest factor in all this).
+1
It's not about the food types - it's the food consumption amount.
Daily calorie intake from 1970 to 2008 has increased a whopping 23%!
https://www.cleveland.com/fighting-fat/2010/04/americans_are_consuming_more_calories_than_ever.htmlWe simply eat too much and have no discipline on portion control!
We also don't walk anymore (watch how people drive around for several minutes fighting for close parking spaces at the malls, stores. stadiums, etc.)
It's not about the all the different diet plans or food types.
Eat less & walk more = weight loss.
But this simple solution doesn't sell books or diet plans.
YMMV can capitulate now.
Pansy wrote:
Toshihiko Seko and David Bedford, 200+ miles a week and lots of beer. Yet we hear pansies on here worrying about if one bear will kill them.
Thing is, it really could.
Quite so wrote:
Pansy wrote:
Toshihiko Seko and David Bedford, 200+ miles a week and lots of beer. Yet we hear pansies on here worrying about if one bear will kill them.
Thing is, it really could.
A grizzly definitely. Deaths from black bears are very rare, but not zero.
Walking and exercise are nice, I do more than my share, but almost worthless for weight control. One phenomenon I never used to see is obese people that are aerobically fit: these folks (many were clearly athletes when younger) cruise around the track at an impressive clip, while sporting ridiculous waistlines and rolls of fat. They obviously are putting in the work to be in some kind of shape, but destroying it when it comes time to put food in their mouths. Even some 17-minute 5K types have 35+ inch waistlines nowadays. Those weren't around even 20 years ago (well there was one famous Kenyan...)
In the '70s I was running 60-90 mpw. Nowadays I run about 60% of that, and have less body fat. This despite not having to exert any greater willpower, other than making better choices at the grocery and not "grabbing a bite" of fast food throughout the day.
What's changed is what and how I eat.
What's changed overall is stuff like food technology: fast food chains substituting lard and saturated fat with toxic, unsatiating PUFA seed oils in the '70s and sugar water conglomerates now are packaging soft drinks in 2L bottles instead of 12 oz cans. Coca cola was 6oz when my dad grew up, and vending machines weren't on every corner. I remember when 7-11 was open from...7AM to 11PM! The only vending machine in our school was an apple machine. People didn't eat six times a day when I grew up. Every mom knew how to say: "No, you have to wait until dinner".
Things like these, all constellated around "low fat/high carb (but plant oils are OK!)", have transformed food into a powerful, hyperpalatable, addictive drug with Fat Bomb ratio of 45% refined carbs + 45% seed oils + 10% crappy protein. This is the evolution in the marketplace, playing in human weainess for this amalgamation of chemicals. It used to be about eating a decent meal, with at least some real food like bacon and eggs a few times a day, now it's just another dopamine hit every few hours, mirroring social media. And the rest of the world, including China, where people were dying of famine by the millions when I was child is facing skyrocketing obesity and diabetes. I find it unbelievable that the entire world suddenly developed a weaker "willpower" and increased laziness, except in the face of systemic changes and increasingly processed and fake food systems. Even the vegans agree with me on that. People aren't lazier, if anything they put in longer hours at the office and on the commute, but they are operating on unconscious triggers exploited by food system design.
Here we go again... Please, give people some rest from your crap.
This is not a good example.
Nutrition implies eating mindfully, aimed at getting all essential nutrients to live a healthy life, not exaggerated calorie counting and stressing over minute details.
By the looks of it, you actually care about the foods you eat, so quit worrying, you are doing great.
You seem really stressed out. Maybe you should click on another topic instead.
YMMV wrote:
Walking and exercise are nice, I do more than my share, but almost worthless for weight control.
Hey, I actually agree with YMMV.
YMMV wrote:
Things like these, all constellated around "low fat/high carb (but plant oils are OK!)", have transformed food into a powerful, hyperpalatable, addictive drug...
And same old screed. It was fun while it lasted.
(sigh)
YMMV makes sense. The reason people are finding it harder to lose weight isn’t really because of laziness, it’s more to do with the fact we have damaged metabolisms and our diets are not really edible anymore. Instead of eating good, real food we are eating things tha our bodies cannot metabolise. They won’t kill us straight away - they might not even kill us at all but the real price we pay for eating this way is reduced quality of life and DNA damage. These food may take a long, long time to finally kill us but over a few years they can make us very, very unhealthy and very, very unhappy. I don’t understand people who say “oh well, I’m gonna eat this entire cake because we are here for a good time, nkt a long time” ... I just think to myself, well, you would be having a “good time” in life if you had a healthy happy body and brain and didn’t need to rely on sweet tastes for a temporary enjoyment... so you’re not really having a good time are you?
Oh and also, I don’t believe in calories in vs calories out rule either. When your metabolism and thyroid are damaged through years of being u health, peope will gain weight on 1200 calorie diets because their metabolic DNA is just absolutely wrecked.
There are lots of skinny people who eat like pigs, much more calories than their BMR and never put the weight on. Why? Because their metabolic DNA is strong. People accept that it is possible to stay thin while eating in a calorie surplus so why don’t people here seem to think vice verse is true? Not everyone who is fat is binge eating. My mother is obese, by a lot, I live with her. I can vouch for the fact she has 1 meal a day plus maybe a packet of chips and is never, ever hungry. 800 calories a day of pure crap, one ready microwaved meal laden with additives and a pack of chips. Not a lot of food, not a lot of calories and the weight just piles on.
I firmly believe if she DOUBLED her calories and ate nutrient dense organic food then the weight would melt off.
Hey look everyone - a real life 2:09 marathoner on the boards. I mean, he must be, since he's pontificating about how "simple" it is - just like Boston Billy, all ya gotta do is just run more ya pansies!
All the meals you mention start off with protein and fat. That's the key. Now they are just carbs and fake fat.
konrad1198 wrote:
RANT INCOMING:
Anybody else feel like there is so much conflicting information about nutrition that it becomes debilitating to oneself? Yeah, I know health is important and eating McDonald's every meal is a surefire way to disaster, but when it comes to the point where I'm avoiding eating a chicken breast because I don't know exactly how many calories are in it unless I weigh it before with the bone and then weigh the bone after, oh and then the oil it was cooked in was it 1 tsp or 2, then it becomes unhealthy and interferes with my training.
I think I know enough to differentiate between what's good for me and what isn't, and I don't need an app or a website to tell me when external factors such as my mood/physical appearance/mental well-being are better indicators. Anybody else feel like this?
If your great grandparents would have eaten it, it's probably fine. If it didn't exist then, think twice. If it is designed to be cooked in a microwave stay clear.
You're ignorant. Look sometimes outside of the US. Look sometimes at the poor people - out of the US. Not much protein or fat. Carbs. That's what they can afford. Africa, Asia, big chunk of Europe and S. America. They are way thinner that Americans.
I want to add to my post wrote:
Oh and also, I don’t believe in calories in vs calories out rule either. When your metabolism and thyroid are damaged through years of being u health, peope will gain weight on 1200 calorie diets because their metabolic DNA is just absolutely wrecked.
What’s metabolic DNA? I bet it works good. All I’ve got is this boring old mitochondrial DNA.