Go back to watching cartoons wrote:
Any reasonable person has seen that Derek gives credit where due. In addition, he uncovered some ‘smoking gun’ evidence.
The fact that he didn’t accuse or suspect the guy before he dug into it is a bad thing?
I spoke to Derek and read his articles. He told me he's never really had this much evidence of a DQ . I mean what more could we want?We have photos of him running onto the course at multiple locations. You literally couldn't have anything more than that short of a video of him coming onto the course or a video of him in a car.
We're supposed to believe the guy ran a WR while stopping on the side several times for several minutes?
I think i should offer $20,000 for a 20:03 - the split for his first 5k. I mean come on the number of 70 years olds that can run 20:03 has to be less than like 5 in the country. Anyone know? This guy is a fraud. Now way can he do it.
Maybe I'll go out and time trial tomorrow. I'm not convinced I could run 20:00 and I was a 2:23 marathoner less than 20 years ago. This guy is 70 and a fraud.