Like I said, there are lots of bright people on these boards, and good arguments can be made for a variety of positions.
Did the guy puff himself up professionally by way of falsely claiming achievements? I certainly think so. Could there have been some pecuniary benefit to him as a result? Possibly, although it is likely indirect and likely pretty modest.
But defending reaching out to someone's employer because they claimed that their false running accomplishments in an effort to puff themselves up all feels more like rationalizing vengeance (for his hubris, for him undercutting Gene Dykes' and Ed Whitlock's accomplishments, for him not giving us the satisfaction of admitting that we got him, etc.) than justice.
Sure, this doesn't happen without his repeated transgressions, but I just think that the punishment should tie into the crime.