Hypocrites wrote:
Typical Letsrun User: I'M NOT RACIST. ALSO ALL BLACK PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS AND ON WELFARE. ALSO I'M MORE OFFENDED BY THIS NYT OP-ED THAN NEO-NAZI PROPAGANDA.
Why so angry biatch?
Hypocrites wrote:
Typical Letsrun User: I'M NOT RACIST. ALSO ALL BLACK PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS AND ON WELFARE. ALSO I'M MORE OFFENDED BY THIS NYT OP-ED THAN NEO-NAZI PROPAGANDA.
Why so angry biatch?
the population with dark skin is roughly 13 percent in the U.S, how would you expect it any other way?
Want a sticker? wrote:
You just got the stamp of approval from one of the biggest morans on the site.
You're another "tolerant" liberal that values free speech and a diversity of ideas.
Oprah Winfrey is a billionaire because of white housewives. There is no racism here.
Serena Williams is a millionaire champion in tennis. There is no racism here.
Blacks have plenty of opportunities and freedoms in America. They have BET channel on TV. They have Black History Month. They get affirmative action.
Dr. Ben Carson grew up poor with a single mother.
https://www.biography.com/people/ben-carson-475422"The family was very poor and, to make ends meet, Sonya sometimes toiled at two or three jobs simultaneously in order to provide for her boys.... She required them to read two library books a week and give her written reports, even though with her poor education, she could barely read them."
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu-uDSnXgAIhuci.jpgDemocrats scream, "Racist!", and want even more, so they can virtue signal. This shows they are unreasonable and illogical due to emotion.
Henry C wrote:
Typical liberal who doesn't know history and misrepresents the other side:
Statistically, a higher percentage of black people are criminals than white people and many more blacks are on welfare. This is because a**hole liberals like you push to keep giving them government benefits so that they don't prosper and rely on the government and encourage them to murder their babies in order to diminish their population. The Nazi party was specifically called the National SOCIALIST Workers Party. In other words, modern socialist liberals want to push for socialism exactly as the Nazi's did. Typical letsrun users are the ones who don't like bull**** and are offended by hypocrisy, thank the LORD. The DEMOCRATIC party is the one that stood for slavery historically. Don't believe that? Then find me a single Republican who owned a slave in the 1860s. In all of America, there was not a single Republican who owned a slave. I'm not saying that you necessarily hate black people, I am just saying that you are brainwashed by liberal hogwash.
Wow, what to address first.
The Nazi's of WW2 were not Socialists. If you believe they were because of the name, then you must also believe the Khmer Rouge were democratic. The Nazi's were nationalistic fascists. Care to guess which American political party today most closely aligns with that ideology?
The Republicans of Lincoln were the liberal party. But you knew that. Why are you trying to give conservatives of today credit for the actions of liberals of the past? Because the name of the team is the same? That's like trying to argue the merits of 2019 Mets based on the achievements of the 1969 Mets. Irrelevant, makes zero sense, and is intentionally misleading.
And reread your post for valid points and found none.
facts and reason wrote:
Want a sticker? wrote:
You just got the stamp of approval from one of the biggest morans on the site.
You're another "tolerant" liberal that values free speech and a diversity of ideas.
Oprah Winfrey is a billionaire because of white housewives. There is no racism here.
Serena Williams is a millionaire champion in tennis. There is no racism here.
Blacks have plenty of opportunities and freedoms in America. They have BET channel on TV. They have Black History Month. They get affirmative action.
Dr. Ben Carson grew up poor with a single mother.
https://www.biography.com/people/ben-carson-475422"The family was very poor and, to make ends meet, Sonya sometimes toiled at two or three jobs simultaneously in order to provide for her boys.... She required them to read two library books a week and give her written reports, even though with her poor education, she could barely read them."
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu-uDSnXgAIhuci.jpgDemocrats scream, "Racist!", and want even more, so they can virtue signal. This shows they are unreasonable and illogical due to emotion.
wow, for a person going by the user name 'facts and reason', your post certainly lacks both. What a bizarre, senseless. rambling rant. It's slightly amusing that it must make sense in your head.
Hypocrites wrote:
there are members of the community saying that all black people on welfare have $200 Jordans.
You're just another liar who says, "Trump said all Mexicans are rapists."
I never said all poor blacks have $200 sneakers.
https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/12/sneakers-have-always-been-political-shoes/511628“In the 1970s, New Yorkers in the basketball and hip-hop community changed the perception of sneakers from sports equipment to tools for cultural expression,” the sneaker historian Bobbito Garcia explains in the Out of the Box catalogue. “The progenitors of sneaker culture were predominantly ... kids of color who grew up in a depressed economic era.”
https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2015/01/02/poverty-self-denial-and-new-nikesDemocrats have lost the argument.
why i love running wrote:
yes, exactly. It's not a big deal. And what is the big deal is how some would make a minor comment into a political mountain in order to advance their single purpose in life.
How's your running going, by the way?
Lol. You must be new to THE ENTIRE LEFTY MODUS OPERANDI.
facts and reason wrote:
Want a sticker? wrote:
You just got the stamp of approval from one of the biggest morans on the site.
You're another "tolerant" liberal that values free speech and a diversity of ideas.
Oprah Winfrey is a billionaire because of white housewives. There is no racism here.
Serena Williams is a millionaire champion in tennis. There is no racism here.
Blacks have plenty of opportunities and freedoms in America. They have BET channel on TV. They have Black History Month. They get affirmative action.
Dr. Ben Carson grew up poor with a single mother.
https://www.biography.com/people/ben-carson-475422"The family was very poor and, to make ends meet, Sonya sometimes toiled at two or three jobs simultaneously in order to provide for her boys.... She required them to read two library books a week and give her written reports, even though with her poor education, she could barely read them."
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cu-uDSnXgAIhuci.jpgDemocrats scream, "Racist!", and want even more, so they can virtue signal. This shows they are unreasonable and illogical due to emotion.
I did some research on Trump's receiving an Ellis Island award. There is no article that states he received it for helping black youths. An AP fact check stated that he received the reward for merely contributing to the community. If it is true he helped black youths it would be a stunning outlier.
https://www.apnews.com/afs:Content:2601590439Good morning thin-skinned people! You still up in arms about one line from an article taken way out of context. Is the power structure in the country as we know it in imminent danger. Are you going to be forced to give up your high-paying jobs and country-club memberships?! Don't worry, you'll still get to play golf and commit white collar crimes and get away with a slap on the wrist.
UncleSquamus wrote:
why i love running wrote:
yes, exactly. It's not a big deal. And what is the big deal is how some would make a minor comment into a political mountain in order to advance their single purpose in life.
How's your running going, by the way?
Lol. You must be new to THE ENTIRE LEFTY MODUS OPERANDI.
Okay, brainiac. The author nominates her mom as the first runner in the series of runners who inspire each of us. Yes, that's right. Her mother!
If that doesn't put the whole thing into context, you need a massive enema, and one big enough to flush the crap out of your head.
It's a light hearted, conversational filler piece that is simply intended to engage hobby joggers.
If you're going to get your bun up in a huff, find something a little less comical.
When I started this thread, I wasn’t trying to be a trouble maker. Actually, I was.
Winchester 73 wrote:
When I started this thread, I wasn’t trying to be a trouble maker. Actually, I was.
9/10! Would be a 10/10 but you posted this—that was unnecessary as things were going so well.
Reading that article it’s amazing to me how thin skinned alt-right types are about a secondary comment that had little to do with the actual article.
Straight white American males have it ssssooooo rough these days! Their struggle is equivalent to emancipation from slavery, overturning of Jim Crow laws, and women’s liberation. In fact it’s tougher than all of those combined.
Also a white hobbyjogger wrote:
free reading comprehension tutorial for you wrote:
As for saying "what about x, y, z minority group," this is to show the NYT author's faulty thinking. It has nothing to do with claiming victim status. It is a way to take the authors premise (that hobby jogging is not perfect because too many white people do it) and inserting other variables into that premise to show that it is a faulty premise. This is abstract rhetorical thinking that maybe you are not capable of. So I'm trying to clearly explain it to you. If/when you respond to me and don't address this argument, it will confirm to everyone capable of this level of abstract thinking, that these rhetorical concepts are beyond you.
Oh, give me a break. You must be aware of the disagreement regarding the underlying assumptions made with your “abstract rhetorical thinking”. More specifically, Right wingers refuse to understand and accept the deep seated systemic racism in the USA that has excluded primarily black and Hispanic folks from having the same access to opportunity and capital that white folks have had. Thus, when those minority groups display what the right calls “victim mentality” they actually have a point based on historical, economic, and political facts. White folks—in gereral—do not have a valid point / argument in this regard.
Of course, most of us realize, that RWNJs and white nationalists reject these facts and thus use invalid comparisons via so-called “abstract rhetorical thinking”.
A more mainstream “light” version of your line of thinking is embodied in the Bush-ism “soft racism of low expectations “ which is just a more moderate way for the majority population to ignore the fact that the crimes and policies of the RECENT past are responsible for the vast majority of the inequities seen between white folks and non-white folks in the US.
In general, as stated above, conservatives reject these type of accurate historical fact based arguements / comparisons out of hand and instead try and argue that non-whites are simply “lazy”, “not taking responsibility for their actions”, or—most disgusting of all—that non-whites are somehow inferior to whites.
Agree, but I think we can all agree that the article had almost nothing to do with race and that the preferences of this or that racial groups for this or that recreational activity / hobby are not the most pressing issues of our time.
fascist is a follower of a political philosophy characterized by authoritarian views and a strong central government — and no tolerance for opposing opinions.
Which followers scream when an opposing viewed speaker shows up at their college? I think you know. Which group burns entire city blocks down and turns I’ve police cars when they don’t agree with justice? I think you know. Which party is in favor of large Givernment with large tax and large social programs? Which party wants to make every minority rich? Which party is in favor of keeping minirities poor and enslaven to the Givernment? I don’t know what history books some of you read to come up with the thought that Republicans of the 19th century were anything other than freedom for all (anti-slavery), pro-work (anti-tax), pro-family (anti-gay marriage), pro legal immigrant, anti-transgender, and pro life (anti-abortion). No those aren’t liberal ideas. Those are conservative ideas. Liberals are anti-freedom, anti-life, anti-idea, and anti-family.
It’s amazing the level of snowflake on this forum. Accept the fact that white is the inferior race. Sure, all pro sports in this country, sans hockey, is overwhelmingly black or people of color. Because whites are personified by the weak, defensive puffs on this forum. I read that article and saw that it states the obvious. The issue has nothing to do with it being negative. It is simply a question of why it does not appeal to others? It has nothing to do with privilege, it is cultural and needs to be questioned because of the importance of exercise and self preservation.
You’re letting your hood and robe show just through the lexicon you are using. Go back to FoxNews and Breitbart.
Platonic wrote:
The NYT is a racist anti-white newspaper.
There's no reason for this sort of view to be surprising.
Yep.
All the voting stock owned by white people who belong to an ethno/religious group that does not consider itself white and in fact hates white people.
They like to trumpet the fact that Carlos Slim is the number one stock holder but he has no voting stock. All held by Sulzberger/Ochs
[quote]facts and reason wrote:
[quote]Want a sticker? wrote:
Blacks have plenty of opportunities and freedoms in America. They have BET channel on TV.
You need to snap out of it and educate yourself.
Sumner Redstone (nee' Murray Rothstein) owns BET.
Same is true for Univision.
Libs don’t listen to opposition wrote:
fascist is a follower of a political philosophy characterized by authoritarian views and a strong central government — and no tolerance for opposing opinions.
Which followers scream when an opposing viewed speaker shows up at their college? I think you know. Which group burns entire city blocks down and turns I’ve police cars when they don’t agree with justice? I think you know. Which party is in favor of large Givernment with large tax and large social programs? Which party wants to make every minority rich? Which party is in favor of keeping minirities poor and enslaven to the Givernment? I don’t know what history books some of you read to come up with the thought that Republicans of the 19th century were anything other than freedom for all (anti-slavery), pro-work (anti-tax), pro-family (anti-gay marriage), pro legal immigrant, anti-transgender, and pro life (anti-abortion). No those aren’t liberal ideas. Those are conservative ideas. Liberals are anti-freedom, anti-life, anti-idea, and anti-family.
Why does the right view nearly everything—such as race relations as a zero sum game? If “they” get something “we” lose something?
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thomas-jefferson-street/articles/2017-09-14/donald-trump-and-the-rise-of-zero-sum-politicshttps://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/19/peter-navarro-zero-sum-game-between-china-and-the-rest-of-the-world.htmlhttps://www.npr.org/2018/07/04/625980971/zero-sum-tactics-that-built-trump-inc-could-backfire-with-world-leadershttps://www.ft.com/content/381f5888-88b0-11e7-bf50-e1c239b45787This is the main problem with the underlying thought process of the political right.
facts and reason wrote:
This is more race-based garbage from leftist trolls.
They NEVER complain that blacks dominate basketball or boxing or sprinting.
There is no problem with racism in professional running. Ethiopians and Kenyans dominate the middle distances and marathons.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/03/bernie-sanders-chicago-speech-brooklyn-college-2020"Acknowledging recently that his 2016 campaign was “too white” and “too male”, Sanders has sought to build an operation that reflects the diversity of the Democratic party. His 2020 effort will be led by Faiz Shakir, the first Muslim campaign manager of a major US presidential candidate."
Vote Democrat if you want more of this leftist garbage from the likes of Bernie Sanders.
Thank you, I will. Has your white sheet been laundered yet? Crisp and wrinkle-free?
