Which group is more annoying?

Dog owners violate the rights of others when they let their dogs assault and batter others. In fact I am considering starting a national dog law in the US. This would mandate dog education training for all prospective owners and harsh penalties for dog owners who violate the rights of others. This dangerous dog culture in the US is going to stop!

I adopt dogs and cats to return them to their natural state of living in the wild. It's cruel that we keep animals for our own pleasure. I set them free to live in the wild the way nature intended.

ConservativeThoughts wrote:

The most judgemental people are usually conservatives who believe that the government and other people should not be in their business, you know, judging them. Then they want to mandate that everyone else follow their beliefs. Liberals also want to mandate that others follow their beliefs.

I actually think both liberals and conservatives don't like the idea of government in their business judging them.

And both want to mandate that everyone follow their beliefs (like you said).

Too many vocal absolutists out there screaming from their twitter accounts and Instagram.

But back to the original question...not a dog fan (or cats either) - don't equate them to humans, ever; I like microbrews, and coffee is ok too. So not sure what that means. I don't consider myself a beer or coffee snob; but do love it when a self-professed "coffee snob" says that Starbucks is the best. Uh oh, I'm being judgmental again.

Not a fan of Micro Beers though - they're waaaay too small.

Dogs.

I can appreciate the beer + coffee folks. While annoying at times, they're right to some extent. You can find really really good beer and coffee. With dogs, people love them and want you to love them even if they cause problems -- barking, chasing, biting. Those things are all somehow your fault to a dog owner.

ConservativeThoughts wrote:

Big Booty Judy wrote:

2>1>3

If any of those are alt left wing nuts move them directly to the top.

The most judgemental people are usually conservatives who believe that the government and other people should not be in their business, you know, judging them. Then they want to mandate that everyone else follow their beliefs. Liberals also want to mandate that others follow their beliefs.

I think nearly everyone wants to mandate that others follow at least some of their beliefs. How many people are opposed to laws against murder or drunk driving? Almost no one.

NewtotheSouthSide wrote:

Dogs.

I can appreciate the beer + coffee folks. While annoying at times, they're right to some extent. You can find really really good beer and coffee. With dogs, people love them and want you to love them even if they cause problems -- barking, chasing, biting. Those things are all somehow your fault to a dog owner.

I know a lot of dog owners, and not a single one falls into this category. Seriously, their dog bites you and they blame you? What percentage of dog owners do you honestly believe match that description?

Judgemental Judy wrote:

1. Dog Owners that think that their dogs are part of their families.

2. Coffee Snobs that can only drink coffee from certain high end places.

3. Micro Beer Drinkers that think they have the best understanding of all that is beer.

1-findo has 3 words, get to fook.

None are more annoying than the cynic doesn’t mind their own business and complains about other people’s interests and harmless takes/opinions.

guess again, you sociopath wrote:

Hourunner wrote:

Answer.

People who have something against dogs.

Dogs suck. Every time I see one his master has to hold on for dear life to the leash to keep the muttt from lunching on my leg.

Clearly, the issue lies with your special leg. You should do a DNA test through Ancestry or Wisdom Panel.

UESer wrote:

Gravy wrote:

+1 Poeple who are so delusional to believe that their stupid animal is "friendly."

What kind of ghetto do you people live in where you have so many negative encounters with dogs? There are dogs all over the Upper East Side. I’ve never had a problem with any of them. I’d probably have run-ins with off-leash pit bulls if I lived in the South Bronx or someplace like that, but then why the hell would I live in a place like that?

Move somewhere where the people are civilized and you’ll find that the dogs are easier to get along with as well.

You live in NY (a dirty grimy city by the way, so much garbage). Dogs are used to seeing tons of people.

Stray dogs in India bothered me less when I was for business than the dogs in my neighborhood where the average house is between $800k-$2 million.

Your Post makes no sense. Dogs bother me everyday when I’m running, because they don’t see thousands of people running, walking, riding bikes, and putting tons of garbage on the sidewalk every night.

“Expert” coaches

“Exercise physiologist” coaches

Long time mediocre coaches who have a “system”

Low mileage distance coaches

Coaches who only focus on their top runner

The drink industry is against strict drunk driving laws. Life is messy however I believe the world must start with this premise:

Do whatever you want, as long as it doesn't violate the rights of anyone else.

Beautiful!

vchguk wrote:

The drink industry is against strict drunk driving laws. Life is messy however I believe the world must start with this premise:

Do whatever you want, as long as it doesn't violate the rights of anyone else.

Beautiful!

The bold is a belief that most people want to force other to live by.

Btw, I am not opposed to this. I'm just saying the idea of "No one should force another person to have to live by his or her beliefs" isn't something nearly anyone actually supports.

I'm sure I work with people that fit into all three groups. I don't know about it, because they don't talk about it.

The annoying people are people that proselytize their beliefs. And proselytizers, regardless of the belief they are pushing, are by far the most annoying people to me.

1. Coffee drinkers

2. A dog is a part of the family, it's the dog. People who act like their dog (or another pet) is a baby or child, or personifies it another way are annoyingly oblivious to what the animal actually needs.

3. Beer drinkers who dont know what theyre talking about regardless of taste preferences.

Judgemental Judy wrote:

1. Dog Owners that think that their dogs are part of their families.

2. Coffee Snobs that can only drink coffee from certain high end places.

3. Micro Beer Drinkers that think they have the best understanding of all that is beer.

4. Chinks

5. Women with a stinky undercarriage

Wtf?

killermike wrote:

NewtotheSouthSide wrote:

Dogs.

I can appreciate the beer + coffee folks. While annoying at times, they're right to some extent. You can find really really good beer and coffee. With dogs, people love them and want you to love them even if they cause problems -- barking, chasing, biting. Those things are all somehow your fault to a dog owner.

I know a lot of dog owners, and not a single one falls into this category. Seriously, their dog bites you and they blame you? What percentage of dog owners do you honestly believe match that description?

Annoying dog owners exist. Why do you think so many in the thread agree with this complaint? Do you think it's a big conspiracy?

Get a big cat; it can take care of all these other problem groups.

Multiple-dog walkers who take up the whole sidewalk.