You want to shut him up just beat him.[/quote]
This type of comment is common, but always misguided. It implies that behavioral standards are contingent on performance: the victor is allowed to do anything he wants; if anyone thinks a behavior is inappropriate, the only true recourse is to dethrone the victor. As if the only thing that matters is denying a kid the opportunity to act inappropriately, not the action itself.
What happens when there is no one out there to "just beat him"? Does the winner get to then do whatever he wants for as long as he wants, regardless of the impact? The extension of this thinking is to create a society that depends only on force, rather than democratic social norms.