hi parker wrote:
Got Dumb? wrote:
Dude, people follow and unfollow all the time, to see if someone is interesting or not.
Clearly, you're just not that freaking interesting. Boo-Yah, ya big baby!
What's up Stinson, how are you tonight?
You beat me to it. Besides going by my good friend Renato's rules Parker Stinson is only really a hobby jogger.
Does anyone think he will "Stinson It" again?
Wondering if wrote:
Does anyone think he will "Stinson It" again?
You be the judge: 1:02:11 with positive splits, had a clear 2nd half fade.
Looks like they met their goal as he ran a PR.
KTHXBAI wrote:
Wondering if wrote:
Does anyone think he will "Stinson It" again?
You be the judge: 1:02:11 with positive splits, had a clear 2nd half fade.
Everybody had a positive 2nd split due to wind. He ran well and he PRd!!
This 1:02 will probably make him top 5 American for 2019 in the half.
no Stinsoning this time wrote:
KTHXBAI wrote:
You be the judge: 1:02:11 with positive splits, had a clear 2nd half fade.
Everybody had a positive 2nd split due to wind. He ran well and he PRd!!
This 1:02 will probably make him top 5 American for 2019 in the half.
positive splits? what are you talking about?
62:11 is 14:44 for 5k.
Stinson's splits: 14:51
29:29 (14:38)
44:11 (14:43)
59:02 (14:52)
62:11 (3:09) for last 1.11 kilometers so 2:51 pace for his last K.
This guy was actually one of the few people who NEGATIVE split / ran even today with bad weather over the second half of the race.
STFU and give credit when credit is due. Great race for him and 62:11 will be a top 5 mark this year in the US now that NYC half course is a competitors course not a time trial one.
positiveHUH? wrote:
[quote]no Stinsoning this time wrote:
[quote]KTHXBAI wrote:
positive splits? what are you talking about?
62:11 is 14:44 for 5k.
Stinson's splits: 14:51
29:29 (14:38)
44:11 (14:43)
59:02 (14:52)
62:11 (3:09) for last 1.11 kilometers so 2:51 pace for his last K.
This guy was actually one of the few people who NEGATIVE split / ran even today with bad weather over the second half of the race.
STFU and give credit when credit is due. Great race for him and 62:11 will be a top 5 mark this year in the US now that NYC half course is a competitors course not a time trial one.
I calculated 14:40 pace for the .555K after the 10k mark. I came up with an actual split of 31:06 (29:29+1:37) so he actually negative split the race by 1 second!!
I also did the same calculation for the SELF COACHED ultra runner of the year Jim Walmsley who split 32:00 (30:20+1:40) on his way to a 1:04 for a PERFECTLY split race while running EXACTLY the Olympic qualifying time!!!!
positiveHUH? wrote:
no Stinsoning this time wrote:
Everybody had a positive 2nd split due to wind. He ran well and he PRd!!
This 1:02 will probably make him top 5 American for 2019 in the half.
positive splits? what are you talking about?
62:11 is 14:44 for 5k.
Stinson's splits: 14:51
29:29 (14:38)
44:11 (14:43)
59:02 (14:52)
62:11 (3:09) for last 1.11 kilometers so 2:51 pace for his last K.
This guy was actually one of the few people who NEGATIVE split / ran even today with bad weather over the second half of the race.
STFU and give credit when credit is due. Great race for him and 62:11 will be a top 5 mark this year in the US now that NYC half course is a competitors course not a time trial one.
But if I had to think I couldn't just rip on the guy to feel better about myself.
KTHXBAI wrote:
positiveHUH? wrote:
positive splits? what are you talking about?
62:11 is 14:44 for 5k.
Stinson's splits: 14:51
29:29 (14:38)
44:11 (14:43)
59:02 (14:52)
62:11 (3:09) for last 1.11 kilometers so 2:51 pace for his last K.
This guy was actually one of the few people who NEGATIVE split / ran even today with bad weather over the second half of the race.
STFU and give credit when credit is due. Great race for him and 62:11 will be a top 5 mark this year in the US now that NYC half course is a competitors course not a time trial one.
But if I had to think I couldn't just rip on the guy to feel better about myself.
Excellent point.
So Stinson proves that LRC was right: by negative-splitting instead of going out like a goofball, he runs to his potential. Good job to Ritz, Parker, and yes, LRC!
btw now it's Ritz turn as he is racing the Rock'n'Roll New Orleans Half tomorrow (sunday 2/9)
tracker
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these