I'd be anti-wall if I had a choice of ending all social welfare.
I'd be anti-wall if I had a choice of ending all social welfare.
Democrat. Don’t care.
Against.
Nope?
You guys should tell Israel or Hungary that Walls Don't Work™
https://twitter.com/netanyahu/status/825371795972825089?lang=en
Against. This article speculates that Republican Congressmen don't especially want the wall and won't be willing to make significant concessions to get it approved:
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Against. This article speculates that Republican Congressmen don't especially want the wall and won't be willing to make significant concessions to get it approved:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2018/12/28/18158873/wall-shutdown-trump-dreamers-deal
Against!
SDSU Aztec wrote:
Against. This article speculates that Republican Congressmen don't especially want the wall and won't be willing to make significant concessions to get it approved:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2018/12/28/18158873/wall-shutdown-trump-dreamers-deal
LOL, Vox.
against. way better ways to get better boarder security and spend money.
So here is the problem. As a country a large portion of our economy is based upon low income work that a majority of people do not want to do. If we create a wall or continue to criminalize immigration a large portion of our economy is continually diminished. The solution isn't a physical wall but rather a socioeconomic one. If we simply create an economy where illegal immigrants have no impetus to enter, illegal immigration will slow rather quickly. Of course this would take many years and an intelligent and well thought out plan, so America will probably never develop one anywhere close to it (at least not while Captain Bankruptcy is running the country).
Against
against
Gruntz wrote:
For, as long as Mexico pays for it.
So we'll put you down as "Against"
Surprised our favorite moderator hasn’t removed all the “against” posts.
Mal......NO wrote:
Surprised our favorite moderator hasn’t removed all the “against” posts.
Which moderator?
I've certainly noticed a hostile slant with the admin here.
Against.
Only 1/3 of illegal immigrants in the country come by land via 'trespassing.'
The wall is a colossal waste of money that could be used else where, even if it is used to for better overall illegal immigration prevention, and possibly a more streamlined process for immigrants to get their citizenship, which from what i've read, is a nightmare and can take many years.
I'm for it as long as they paint it orange.
Bad Wigins wrote:
Concrete Foreman wrote:
The myth of the lazy illegal immigrant is not what I have found in my life. These guys are the hardest working hombres you can imagine-performing backbreaking work for very low pay. Give us your hungry, your tired, your poor, your hungry, yearning to be free. That's America, man.
The ironic flaming racism of the Democrats.
Also ironic is this "waste of money" line. Even if it's coming from Republicans.
True. Why don't Democrats let him "waste" 5 billion so his 63 million supporters shut up already and the issue goes away? Seems like a good deal, but they won't do it because they hate Trump and reflexively oppose anything he does, even things they spoke in favor of 5 years ago.
But mainly I'm talking about how good the Dems feel about themselves for wanting a disadvantaged slave labor caste. Soooooo virtuous.
Bad Wigins wrote:
But mainly I'm talking about how good the Dems feel about themselves for wanting a disadvantaged slave labor caste. Soooooo virtuous.
You must think the Democrats still care for the poor working class. The truth is they favor open borders in exchange for future votes.