Poll: for or against the wall

it's telling wrote:

even on this conservative, American site

Do you have statistics that show that letsrun is made of mostly conservative members?

it's telling wrote:

it's informative that even on this conservative, American site, that the votes are OVERWHELMINGLY against the wall......the people who are supposed to 'benefit' from the wall don't even want it

...but some random nutjob racist wacko form the UK is supporting it with 3 exclamation points.

this isn't a wall for Americans.

It's a wall for deranged, racist wackos.

facts and reason wrote:

it's telling wrote:

even on this conservative, American site

Do you have statistics that show that letsrun is made of mostly conservative members?

HAHAHAHA!

good one.

Full NPC Mode wrote:

it's telling wrote:

it's informative that even on this conservative, American site, that the votes are OVERWHELMINGLY against the wall......the people who are supposed to 'benefit' from the wall don't even want it

...but some random nutjob racist wacko form the UK is supporting it with 3 exclamation points.

this isn't a wall for Americans.

It's a wall for deranged, racist wackos.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tqqwTgk8ri0

troll talent level = 0

at least produce your own material .you cut-and-paste sack of regurgitated fascism.

Full NPC Mode wrote:

it's telling wrote:

it's informative that even on this conservative, American site, that the votes are OVERWHELMINGLY against the wall......the people who are supposed to 'benefit' from the wall don't even want it

...but some random nutjob racist wacko form the UK is supporting it with 3 exclamation points.

this isn't a wall for Americans.

It's a wall for deranged, racist wackos.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tqqwTgk8ri0

look at all that independent thought.

Your score is in wrote:

Full NPC Mode wrote:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tqqwTgk8ri0

troll talent level = 0

at least produce your own material .you cut-and-paste sack of regurgitated fascism.

Yes, please keep insulting and calling people who don't agree with you racist, fascist, sexist etc. Because, that's how you have good dialogue with people who have opposing view points(I wonder why this country is so divided?). Maybe you should read the story about the boy who cried wolf. Because majority of the people you insult and call racist, sexist, fascist etc. are not racist, sexist fascist etc.

confirmed, you are a moran wrote:

HAHAHAHA!

good one.

You can't even spell "moron" correctly in your name. The ad hominem fallacy doesn't work. I haven't seen a scientific poll taken about letsrunners, and there are large number of anonymous posters.

Democrats are emotionally biased and cannot be trusted.

only person I called racist was Coevett, who would probably proudly accept that title.

yawn....Next....

facts and reason wrote:

confirmed, you are a moran wrote:

HAHAHAHA!

good one.

You can't even spell "moron" correctly in your name. The ad hominem fallacy doesn't work. I haven't seen a scientific poll taken about letsrunners, and there are large number of anonymous posters.

Democrats are emotionally biased and cannot be trusted.

Newbs are emotionally biased and cannot be trusted.

Walls are literally racist wrote:

...

Also, why can't a foreigner have a opinion on another countries politics?

Because that is literally an impossibility.

Now, if you want to have an opinion on another country's politics that is an entirely different matter.

don't pretend to be even dumber than you are wrote:

It's not unusual for a person to have an opinion on another countries politics . . .

Actually, it is.

I ask all of you Democrats here, is Obama racist or not?

facts and reason wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWzAiTPfmQE

I ask all of you Democrats here, is Obama racist or not?

First line from your video:

Obama: "We all agree on the need to better secure the border and punish employers who choose to hire illegal immigrants"

Not a whole lot about a wall there. And pretty much what most on here (and elsewhere) agree on. Securing our border and keeping illegal immigration to a minimum is desirable. A wall is moronic.

facts and reason wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWzAiTPfmQE

I ask all of you Democrats here, is Obama racist or not?

what does this have to do with shutting the government to demand a wall that practically no sane and reasonable person wants?

Who is actually arguing that Trump's wall is the best way to stem illegal immigration?

Literally Literal, Figuratively Speaking wrote:

facts and reason wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWzAiTPfmQE

I ask all of you Democrats here, is Obama racist or not?

First line from your video:

Obama: "We all agree on the need to better secure the border and punish employers who choose to hire illegal immigrants"

Not a whole lot about a wall there. And pretty much what most on here (and elsewhere) agree on. Securing our border and keeping illegal immigration to a minimum is desirable. A wall is moronic.

Walls are stupid and don't work.

Also:

how did we ever manage to survive without a wall for so long?

I’m not going to track 3000 years history of para-political subversion for you. You are blind or have ZERO correlation skills if you can’t connect the dots that-

UN/European Union agenda for mass illegal imigration is designed to:

1)destabilize local culture,

2)break down local autonomy

3)and facilitate centralized control.

It’s a total sham in the US where shadow organizations encourage these caravan wankers to cause a scene on the border. Total manufactured chaos. If you can’t see that is what’s happening- then, oh well. Others do.

Bannon types- bad ass. Populist movement- saving countries. Strong borders- protection from Soros type globalist chaos agenda.

M A GA

Whose Who's wrote:

Reality check ? wrote:

FOR

It’s not about drugs. It’s to stop a 100% agenda to use migration as a weapon and destabilize US with parasites.

Look at Europe- sadly just a s#*+hole country trajectory

Trump stood up to the Globalist agenda.

Bite us.

A 100% agenda, huh? Those are the worst kind!

Tell me, an the existence of an agenda, especially a 100% agenda, suggests the existence of someone whose agenda it is. Who is this someone with the 100% agenda? Who is Mr. (Mrs.?) Globalist?

I’m not going to track 3000 years history of para-political subversion for you. You are blind or have ZERO correlation skills if you can’t connect the dots that-

UN/European Union agenda for mass illegal imigration is designed to:

1)destabilize local culture,

2)break down local autonomy

3)and facilitate centralized control.

It’s a total sham in the US where shadow organizations encourage these caravan wankers to cause a scene on the border. Total manufactured chaos. If you can’t see that is what’s happening- then, oh well. Others do.

Bannon types- bad ass. Populist movement- saving countries. Strong borders- protection from Soros type globalist chaos agenda.

M A GA