Fear has favorites
Don't let
One
Be you
Fear has favorites
Don't let
One
Be you
Against.
Reason #58: Terrorists caught on southern border 2018 = 6; Terrorists caught on Canadian border = 41. (Source: NYT)
Against. Most drugs entering the country a) come here on trucks, b) satisfy American markets. So, a wall has little or nothing to do with them. A wall is ineffective over a 2,000 mile border. 2/3 of illegal immigrants fly in and overstay their visas. This is a huge boondoggle to address what is essentially a non-problem, because total immigration from Mexico has been negative (an outflow) since late in the GW Bush years. Republicans could have passed this for two years of total control and they did not. Hence, this is merely a wedge issue, nothing more--maybe a little more if you add the likely graft and corruption and profits to Trump's family that he is likely to arrange (remember how he said he knew how to build walls).
Against, because it's a stupid idea.
Build it soon. FOR
Bad Wigs wrote:
Bad Wigins nailed this one. Liberal morality exposed.
Way to go, Bad Wigins! Supporting yourself using another name is just so . . . so . . . You!
Against.
Think Better PLEASE wrote:
Just thinkingh wrote:
For.
No solution is 100% but if done correctly a barrier will eliminate most illegal immigration. Maybe the best alternate is to reduce the incentives by reducing government benefits but that is even less likely than Congress approving the wall. Of course the wall would have another benefit of reducing drug traffic and child trafficing.
Even if 100% effective it would absolutely NOT "eliminate most illegal immigration." Most illegal immigration does not come from people sneaking over our southern border in the first place. So your claim is, with 100% certainty, FALSE.
Please educate yourself at least a little bit before forming your opinions - generally a good practice.
How did you go about educating yourself?
I would like to educate myself at least a little bit before forming my opinions - generally a good practice - but I don't know where to begin.
Mines team say the wall won't stop drugs. So, no wall. Shaking my head.
For
FOR
It’s not about drugs. It’s to stop a 100% agenda to use migration as a weapon and destabilize US with parasites.
Look at Europe- sadly just a s#*+hole country trajectory
Trump stood up to the Globalist agenda.
Bite us.
Finisher wrote:
Terrorists caught on southern border 2018 = 6; Terrorists caught on Canadian border = 41.
Terrorism is not the only reason for a wall.
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/majority-media/chairman-johnson-releases-report-on-israeli-homeland-security-and-applicable-lessons-for-the-united-states"The number of illegal crossers on the Israel-Egypt border dropped after the construction of the fence, from more than 16,000 in 2011 to less than 20 in 2016—a 99 percent decrease."
Walls work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWzAiTPfmQEObama said we need to secure the border. Do you agree or disagree with this?
I live in Mexico.
I'm for whatever keeps you crazies north of the border. So, I'm glad we got you to pay for it (almost). All we need to do is fill in the gaps at the border crossings to keep the horde from coming our way once things get really bad.
For only if we put Nancy and Chuck on the south side.
Reality check ? wrote:
FOR
It’s not about drugs. It’s to stop a 100% agenda to use migration as a weapon and destabilize US with parasites.
Look at Europe- sadly just a s#*+hole country trajectory
Trump stood up to the Globalist agenda.
Bite us.
A 100% agenda, huh? Those are the worst kind!
Tell me, an the existence of an agenda, especially a 100% agenda, suggests the existence of someone whose agenda it is. Who is this someone with the 100% agenda? Who is Mr. (Mrs.?) Globalist?
Coevett wrote:
Build the wall!!
Don't you live in the UK? Why do you give 2 fks about a wall between the US and Mexico? Oh yeah, you re a moran.
your unfettered passion for all things racist is showing (again)
geography, buddy wrote:
Coevett wrote:
Build the wall!!
Don't you live in the UK? Why do you give 2 fks about a wall between the US and Mexico? Oh yeah, you re a moran.
your unfettered passion for all things racist is showing (again)
Because fortifications are litteraly racist. If you are not for open borders, you are litteraly racist.
Excuse me........ wrote:
geography, buddy wrote:
Don't you live in the UK? Why do you give 2 fks about a wall between the US and Mexico? Oh yeah, you re a moran.
your unfettered passion for all things racist is showing (again)
Because fortifications are litteraly racist. If you are not for open borders, you are litteraly racist.
I not commenting on the wall, i'm commenting on the reasons for a UK resident to support it.
MAybe you have some insight?
it's informative that even on this conservative, American site, that the votes are OVERWHELMINGLY against the wall......the people who are supposed to 'benefit' from the wall don't even want it
...but some random nutjob racist wacko form the UK is supporting it with 3 exclamation points.
this isn't a wall for Americans.
It's a wall for deranged, racist wackos.
care to explain? wrote:
Excuse me........ wrote:
Because fortifications are litteraly racist. If you are not for open borders, you are litteraly racist.
I not commenting on the wall, i'm commenting on the reasons for a UK resident to support it.
MAybe you have some insight?
Probably because British people know walls work.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peace_linesAlso, why can't a foreigner have a opinion on another countries politics?