Depends on what your definition of “bad” is.
Depends on what your definition of “bad” is.
Notice how the dbäg OP fails to mention what he considers a bad neighborhood and where it is he supposedly walks through.
My guess is he’s clueless about this and many other things in life.
I’ll show him lots of ‘bad’ neighborhoods and then we’ll see him starting a different themed thread.
I went into a bad neighborhood once and was assaulted by two young men. They tried to actually take my car. How brazen was that? But I was quick and got out of there real fast. I now never go to these areas. Thankfully the world is getting much more peaceful and someday, I believe fairly soon, everywhere will be a safe place, day or night.
zxcvzcxv wrote:
Almost all of the negative comments have come from white men, mostly young, in cars or trucks.
humm... let us ponder that interesting tidbit for awhile. white, male PRIVILEGE.
Missed you at the rally!
Catch you next time
The Liberals Hate Statistics rally?
Racislibral wrote:
TikiTom wrote:
Missed you at the rally!
Catch you next time
The Liberals Hate Statistics rally?
The GOP bury your head in the sand and deflect rally.
beerbong frat boy rally wrote:
Racislibral wrote:
The Liberals Hate Statistics rally?
The GOP bury your head in the sand and deflect rally.
An Algorithm for Liberal Discourse. vol. 1
Did someone challenge your beliefs?
1. No -- Carry on!
2. Yes -- Call them a racist. Carry on!
Racislibral wrote:
beerbong frat boy rally wrote:
The GOP bury your head in the sand and deflect rally.
An Algorithm for Liberal Discourse. vol. 1
Did someone challenge your beliefs?
1. No -- Carry on!
2. Yes -- Call them a racist. Carry on!
Did someone challenge your beliefs?
1. No -- Keep on hating!
2. Yes -- Call them a misandrist or racist and whine about how your rights have been trampled on. Grab a six pack, your NRA membership and keep percolating the hate by selectively exposing yourself to propaganda and people that agree with your skewed reality.
brad99 wrote:
I walk through "bad" neighborhoods all the time and I never run into any trouble. I think you guys watch too much tv. Nobody's gonna run up on you and start shooting.
Grow a pair.
I hear your words but am not convinced your "pair" will help you.
In HS my friend and i (2 suburban white boys) re driving in South Providence RI in his moms station wagon
A car pulled up, the passenger pointed a gun at us and we were chased out.
A few years ago we took a wrong turn in Philadelphia and ended up on a side street blocked by 2 cars and a young man caame up to the car brandishing a large knife. I drove on the sidewalk to get away.
Perhaps I jumped to a conclusion too rapidly in these cases but I dont think so.
I had a friend's girlfriend get raped and murdered in a bad neighborhood. It was very sad.
It's probably a good idea to be vigilant.
got myself multiple pairs wrote:
brad99 wrote:
I walk through "bad" neighborhoods all the time and I never run into any trouble. I think you guys watch too much tv. Nobody's gonna run up on you and start shooting.
Grow a pair.
I agree with you. I have contempt for people who fear boogie men. I lived in a "bad" neighborhood for many years without even a single incident. I go to a "good" neighborhood and am attacked, not once, but twice by so called "respectable"-looking people. Wound up a bleeding mess after once of the attacks. I quickly learned not to trust people who hide behind their privilege.
I think you’ve learned your lesson. Stay in your hole.
I went to college in Cleveland and a kid a knew missed his stop on the bus for campus and went one stop too far into East Cleveland and what was considered a bad part of town. He's Asian and got jumped by a group of black guys who bloodied him up real bad.
It also needs to be clear how one is defining "good" or "bad" neighborhoods. There are plenty of areas where the locals think there are "bad" areas, but are still pretty decent.
John Utah wrote:
got myself multiple pairs wrote:
I agree with you. I have contempt for people who fear boogie men. I lived in a "bad" neighborhood for many years without even a single incident. I go to a "good" neighborhood and am attacked, not once, but twice by so called "respectable"-looking people. Wound up a bleeding mess after once of the attacks. I quickly learned not to trust people who hide behind their privilege.
I think you’ve learned your lesson. Stay in your hole.
I learned my lesson, alright. My strategy is to go where I want to go and get in your ugly face before you get in mine. It's simple, really. And, very, very effective.
Politifact rated pants on fire false the claim that 80% of interracial crimes were black on white.
Considering just homicide, where the perpetrator and victim were both identified clearly by race, it's nowhere near 80%. Not only do interracial killings of whites by blacks and blacks by whites constitute only 12% of murder victims, but killings of whites by blacks were 68% of this type of interracial murder, not 80%.
Black people need to worry about being murdered far more proportionally than whites, with over 52% of all murder victims being black, despite being only 13.3% of the population. 81% of white murder victims were killed by whites.
"Overall, killings of blacks by whites and whites by blacks accounted for about 12 percent of the roughly 6,000 homicides last year in which police had information about the race of both victim and killer – a slight increase from around 11 percent in 2014. About 15.8 percent of white victims were killed by blacks last year, and 8.6 percent of black victims were killed by whites."
"The statistics show that the 500 killings of white people attributed to blacks last year were the most since black perpetrators were determined to be responsible for the homicides of 504 white people nationwide in 2008. Last year's total was up 12 percent from the 446 recorded in 2014 and 22 percent from the 409 seen in 2013, a year that saw the lowest total this century and one that capped seven years of general declines in black-on-white homicides. Prior to that, 2006 saw the most black-on-white killings since 2001, with 573.
The 229 black lives taken by white killers last year, however, marked an even larger leap from 2014, jumping more than 22 percent from the 187 black victims killed by whites that year, which was the second-lowest total since 2001. The tally was last exceeded in 2008, when 230 blacks were slain by whites. The highest total in the last 15 years came in 2007, when 245 black people were killed by whites."
"Black people have consistently accounted for close to half the country's homicide victims, making up more than 50 percent of the broader pool of those killed overall every year since 2010. The number of black victims increased 15 percent in 2015 over 2014.
Of the 13,455 cases from last year in which the FBI listed a victim's racial information, 7,039 victims – or 52.3 percent – were black. That compares with 5,854 cases – or 43.5 percent – in which the victim was white, an increase of about 8 percent from last year.
It's a disparity that becomes more pronounced in the context of population, as 2015 Census estimates suggest that whites account for 77.1 percent of the overall U.S. population of roughly 321 million, while blacks comprise 13.3 percent."
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-09-29/race-and-homicide-in-america-by-the-numbers
Scouts wrote:
OP just moved out of the suburbs and into the big city. Still very proud of the fact that he firmly believes that they're all "just like us". It's still inconceivable that somebody would hate him and assault/kill him just because of the color of his skin. OP thinks he can diffuse any situation with a big fresh faced smile.
No PDSD or traumatic brain injury yet for OP, so what could anybody possibly be afraid of?
In 20 years OP will finally research violent and property crime stats by ethnicity, after another 20 years of trying to believe that his growing sample size of negative personal experiences are the exception, and not the norm.
In 30 years, OP might even look up Neanderthal DNA by ethnic group, and find out which one of these is not like the others.
Neanderthal DNA is most prevalent in the white / European DNA line who went around fucking their 'ancestors'. Blacks are probably the purest homo sapiens sapiens.
It is true that only Sub-Saharan Africans are 100% Homo Sapiens Sapiens, no probably about it. Europeans, Asians, and American Indians are similar in Neanderthal DNA, about 98% Homo Sapiens Sapiens, 2% Neanderthal. Melanesians and Australian Aborigines are about 95% Homo Sapiens Sapiens, 5% Denisovan.
What this means, I don't pretend to know. White Supremacists and Black Supremacists both seem to like to bang on about it. They can't both be right, and probably neither are. One thing is for sure: we are all human.
got myself multiple pairs wrote:
John Utah wrote:
I think you’ve learned your lesson. Stay in your hole.
I learned my lesson, alright. My strategy is to go where I want to go and get in your ugly face before you get in mine. It's simple, really. And, very, very effective.
Sounds like that didn’t work out too well for you last time.
Probably better for you to stay in your hole.
RIP: D3 All-American Frank Csorba - who ran 13:56 in March - dead
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
Running for Bowerman Track Club used to be cool now its embarrassing
Rest in Peace Adrian Lehmann - 2:11 Swiss marathoner. Dies of heart attack.
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year