Northest Republican wrote:
So, NYT and Washington Post are not credible sources, but MoonofAlabama blog is?
I could see the meddling occurring during the election even before it was getting wide spread reporting. When Podesta's emails were hacked and it seemed it was the Russians that did it, it all made sense. I was alarmed to see people I know being manipulated by foreign interests.
I actually get my info from a wide variety of sources and I even read up on different/opposing views. I research and deduce to form my opinion. Why do you assume everyone else mindlessly absorbs mainstream media and you alone are truly informed?!!
Of course you could compare the extensively sourced analysis of MoA vs the NY Times for example but you won't. None of this is difficult to understand- the paper of record is hardly going to give an honest account on any issues of magnitude- particularly when it comes to honestly covering US War Crimes and US Imperialism- as it's advertiser's and owners understand their role as a mechanism of the State. Same is true for the WaPO. How many lies from the NY Times and WaPo do we need to dredge up for you to get a clue? These papers do not exist to present an accurate depiction of the world they exist to serve power. At these places we have stenographers not journalists.
58 pages worth here:
26 pages here: