Hardloper wrote:
EverClever wrote:
I could not find a formula for this.
There isn't one
VDOT is a formula for it which is reasonably accurate for most people. Moreover, knowing your actual VO2 max is basically useless.
Hardloper wrote:
EverClever wrote:
I could not find a formula for this.
There isn't one
VDOT is a formula for it which is reasonably accurate for most people. Moreover, knowing your actual VO2 max is basically useless.
You can use HRmax/HRrest*15 or HRmax/HRrest*15 .7.
Being a forefoot striker which has carried over from my youth sprinting background, I most likely have higher vertical displacement than your typical long distance heel striker.
Give me your height and I can estimate your shoe size...
Also, you should look into learning the difference between a guess and an estimate...
Andrew Coggan wrote:
Crunching your numbers, I get 40.3 mL/min/kg.
40.3 for a runner?
On a related note, I've found the VO2max estimate from the newer Garmin watches to be pretty accurate, particularlyafter a few weeks.
3 elite women runners had VO2 max values of 73, 69 and 60.4 and vVO2max values of 328,329 and 331 and 3k best times of 9:04, 9:07, 9:08 . No formula to convert vVO2 to VO2 values
ACSM Metabolic Equations wrote:
Give me your height and I can estimate your shoe size...
Actually Andrew I would be much more interested in the correlation between shoe size and running economy.
5' 8"
Yes I am a runner