Cheating handed on a plate said: THAT is the answer to you question. Although I still believe you must be playing the fool for some reason to claim you cannot understand how that hasn't been demonstrated.
you have not answered the question.
so that you can understand where I'm coming from let us think not about running shoes but about oranges. an orange has a specific colour. an orange also has a quite definite taste. there is, however, no connection between the colour and the taste. they just happen to be two unrelated properties of oranges. an orange doesn't taste acidic "because" it is orange coloured, and it isn't coloured orange "because" it tastes acidic. the two properties are not connected or related in any way.
in exactly the same way, If I threw two running shoes into a pool and one floated a lot longer than the other, this would not tell us anything at all about any other properties the shoes might have. one might be a motion control shoe and one not, but it doesn't float longer "because" it is a motion control shoe, and it doesn't offer motion control "because" it floats longer. the two properties are unrelated in any way.
in exactly the same way, in tests it has been shown that the Nike Vaporfly 4% helps runners run faster. this is one property the shoe has. no one doubts that this is so.
in a video it has been demonstrated that the Nike Vaporfly 4% will flip higher off the ground than other running shoes when bent into a position it will not achieve in normal running. this is another property the shoe has.
these are two unrelated properties of that specific running shoe. the article in Outside magazine said that the guys who designed and built the shoes don't know how they make runners faster. that the guy who patented the metal plate in the shoe doesn't know why the shoe makes runners faster. that two independent studies of how the shoe is designed and made could not explain how the shoe makes runners faster. all these people say that they are unable to explain the property of the shoe that makes runners faster. and, since they are unable to explain this property, they would be unable to connect it to any other property the shoe has. they have no idea whether its "flippability" is related to running faster or not. they suspect it might be, but they don't really know. the direct quote from the magazine on the relevant part of the investigation is: "They’re not sure what’s going on."
you, however, claim that watching a video makes it immediately "obvious" that the property of flippping higher is directly connected to the property of running faster. none of the people quoted in Outside magazine would make that claim but you do, because to you it is sufficiently obvious that anyone who cannot see it is called "moronic" and a "chump," and, "lacking in self-awareness." but you have now had four opportunities to explain this connection and you haven't done it. you just obfuscate and prevaricate and resort to name calling, but explanation is entirely absent.
which means that you are in the position of claiming that something is so blatantly obvious that people who cannot see it get called names, but you are utterly unable to explain this obvious thing in any way. you don't have the vocabulary to explain what you think think should be "obvious" to everyone else. your entire line of reasoning is: there's the video, off you go.
and my whole point has been that you are merely making an assumption:
runners can run faster in the shoe, AND it flips higher than other shoes, THEREFORE these two properties are related.
but, since the guys who designed and built the shoe cannot see that connection, I instead conclude that there is no logical explanation that can connect those two properties of the shoe, and therefore no valid reason to make the same assumption as you, and that you will never explain it, because you can not, because it does not exist.
you are the guy explaining to the world's press that you saw the Loch Ness Monster. you have a video to prove it. you are utterly convinced that you are right and blithely unaware that no one else takes anything you say seriously.
cheers.