MM will never be Queen cos Harry will never be King cos he ain't got no Royal blood in him:
MM will never be Queen cos Harry will never be King cos he ain't got no Royal blood in him:
More numinous wrote:
Royal Commentator. wrote:
It’s not even close. England can have a soft 7 or a hard 9 for their next queen. And Kate seems like nerd, which matches her nerd husband.
If you are going to have a monarchy, at least base it on something meaningful, like looks, rather than a genetic lottery.
You and some of the other posters in this thread seem to be representative of readers of “People” magazine who also are quite porn-addled. Congratulations.
So your argument is that People magazine and all its readers find Meghan more attractive? The same People that’s the 9th most widely circulated magazine in America behind a bunch of AARP and Costco newsletters?
I think that boosts my case for why she should be the next queen.
As two posts have correctly stated, neither can be queen.
And to the doüchebag that had a very intellectual response of 0/10, you sir are an imbecile.
Queen’s hubby is named ‘King Phillip.’
Yeah right you doüchebag.
Are you guys faking your stupidity? wrote:
As two posts have correctly stated, neither can be queen.
And to the doüchebag that had a very intellectual response of 0/10, you sir are an imbecile.
Queen’s hubby is named ‘King Phillip.’
Yeah right you doüchebag.
You just stated " Queen’s hubby is named ‘King Phillip.’ ", oh right, it was supposed to be " " Queen’s hubby is named ‘King Phillip.’ ?"
Imbecile.
Are you guys faking your stupidity? wrote:
As two posts have correctly stated, neither can be queen.
And to the doüchebag that had a very intellectual response of 0/10, you sir are an imbecile.
Queen’s hubby is named ‘King Phillip.’
Yeah right you doüchebag.
You should read this sunshine and the links within it, Queen seems to pop up quite regularly:
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a22676387/kate-middleton-title-prince-william-becomes-king-queen-catherine/Are you guys faking your stupidity? wrote:
As two posts have correctly stated, neither can be queen.
I'm guessing what you mean is she can't become Queen reigning constitutional monarch and head of state, but she can become Queen as in Queen consort, which means she can be a queen.
Royal Commentator. wrote:
More numinous wrote:
You and some of the other posters in this thread seem to be representative of readers of “People” magazine who also are quite porn-addled. Congratulations.
So your argument is that People magazine and all its readers find Meghan more attractive? The same People that’s the 9th most widely circulated magazine in America behind a bunch of AARP and Costco newsletters?
I think that boosts my case for why she should be the next queen.
You are proving yourself even more vapid than I thought. Congratulations again.
More numinous wrote:
Royal Commentator. wrote:
So your argument is that People magazine and all its readers find Meghan more attractive? The same People that’s the 9th most widely circulated magazine in America behind a bunch of AARP and Costco newsletters?
I think that boosts my case for why she should be the next queen.
You are proving yourself even more vapid than I thought. Congratulations again.
But the guy aching for anal sex has me thinking he is an above-average candidate for some looming disease transmitted by feces.
More numinous wrote:
Royal Commentator. wrote:
So your argument is that People magazine and all its readers find Meghan more attractive? The same People that’s the 9th most widely circulated magazine in America behind a bunch of AARP and Costco newsletters?
I think that boosts my case for why she should be the next queen.
You are proving yourself even more vapid than I thought. Congratulations again.
I dunno, you pretty much confirmed most people think Markle is hotter. He got you there.
Are you guys faking your stupidity? wrote:
As two posts have correctly stated, neither can be queen.
And to the doüchebag that had a very intellectual response of 0/10, you sir are an imbecile.
Queen’s hubby is named ‘King Phillip.’
Yeah right you doüchebag.
An idiot and doüchebag calling out others for stupidity and doüchebaggery when he is an idiot and doüchebag himself.
"...the wives of Kings can be Queens, the husbands of Queens cannot be Kings. Chalk it up to the patriarchy (like so many royal traditions), but Kings always reign, whereas Queen can be a symbolic title, as it will be in the case of Queen Catherine. Hence why Queen Elizabeth's husband, the Duke of Edinburgh is a Prince consort, not a King consort."
Pics....PICS.....PICS.....this thread sucks without PICS
Coach B+ wrote:
More numinous wrote:
You are proving yourself even more vapid than I thought. Congratulations again.
I dunno, you pretty much confirmed most people think Markle is hotter. He got you there.
How, Coach B+, did I "pretty much confirm[...]" that? I don't have a dog in the fight. I was just commenting on the silliness of the whole inordinate celebrity fixation and some of the porn-tinged, if not porn-addled, comments in this thread. Perhaps you should rebrand yourself as "Coach D-." That would be more consistent with your argumentation skills.
More numinous wrote:
Coach B+ wrote:
I dunno, you pretty much confirmed most people think Markle is hotter. He got you there.
How, Coach B+, did I "pretty much confirm[...]" that? I don't have a dog in the fight. I was just commenting on the silliness of the whole inordinate celebrity fixation and some of the porn-tinged, if not porn-addled, comments in this thread. Perhaps you should rebrand yourself as "Coach D-." That would be more consistent with your argumentation skills.
You confirmed that a debate over their attractiveness was completely valid in determining who should be the queen.
I apologize for misreading that you thought Megan was hotter.
Coach B+ wrote:
You confirmed that a debate over their attractiveness was completely valid in determining who should be the queen.
How did he do that?
Royal Commentator. wrote:
Let’s get some outside blood in there. Kate is too old school England. Megan all the way!
Yes.
William made the PATHETIC choice, selecting from within the pool of Lord/Baron's daughters that he was instructed to. It might as well be an arranged marriage with a pool of maybe hundreds, probably just dozens, of eligible females of the right age that he could even consider.
Harry made the BALLER choice, expanding his pool to include not only heiresses but TV starlets.
Q: Looks are a ______. (hint: G_____ L_____) wrote:
Royal Commentator. wrote:
If you are going to have a monarchy, at least base it on something meaningful, like looks, rather than a genetic lottery.
Dear lord there are some idiots posting here.
/ thread
You couldn't make up the stupidity of some. wrote:
"...the wives of Kings can be Queens, the husbands of Queens cannot be Kings. Chalk it up to the patriarchy (like so many royal traditions), but Kings always reign, whereas Queen can be a symbolic title, as it will be in the case of Queen Catherine. Hence why Queen Elizabeth's husband, the Duke of Edinburgh is a Prince consort, not a King consort."
Consort: Two people, usually of the opposite sex, who form a bond for a temporary period during which the two individuals maintain close proximity and engage in mating or other sexual behavior.
He’s not a doüchebag at all. She will be given an honorary title but will NOT be the official queen because she has no royal blood.
Ask any Brit you ärsehole.
Never be a real queen wrote:
He’s not a doüchebag at all. She will be given an honorary title but will NOT be the official queen because she has no royal blood.
Ask any Brit you ärsehole.
According to the Royal family and the official Royal website she WILL be Queen , which is what some idiots are saying she cannot become:
"The Queen's grandmother, Queen Mary, aged 81 was the first Queen to see a grandchild ascend to the throne."
"The most recent British Queen consort was Elizabeth II's mother, [B]Queen Elizabeth[b/]. Following the death of her husband King George VI, she opted to assume the title of the Queen Mother, so that she would not be confused with her daughter, Queen Elizabeth II."
You couldn't make up the stupidity of some. wrote:
Are you guys faking your stupidity? wrote:
As two posts have correctly stated, neither can be queen.
And to the doüchebag that had a very intellectual response of 0/10, you sir are an imbecile.
Queen’s hubby is named ‘King Phillip.’
Yeah right you doüchebag.
An idiot and doüchebag calling out others for stupidity and doüchebaggery when he is an idiot and doüchebag himself.
"...the wives of Kings can be Queens, the husbands of Queens cannot be Kings. Chalk it up to the patriarchy (like so many royal traditions), but Kings always reign, whereas Queen can be a symbolic title, as it will be in the case of Queen Catherine. Hence why Queen Elizabeth's husband, the Duke of Edinburgh is a Prince consort, not a King consort."
Hey Jacko, quit it with your rules of succession. They’ve been ignored since the beginning of time. Anyone can be queen if they take it. And they certainly won’t be inviting you to any parties.