Worst thread of the year.
Worst thread of the year.
Subway Surfers wrote:
Worst thread of the year.
Thanks for the contribution!
They are just not famous wrote:
None of these people are really good looking. You can find much more attractive people anywhere.
But you can’t find future potential queens anywhere. This isn’t a thread on who’s the hottest person anywhere in the world.
Currently Kate is hotter. Royal handlers make Megan look a lot less attractive than she did on Suits.
Republic is hotter than Monarchy and on that basis, the UK should become a republic next.
Only one post is correct in this thread.
Neither will ever be queen. They can’t be.
But if I must choose I’d much prefer to explore that dark tunnel in Meghan’s arse.
You guys are idiots...sans one wrote:
Neither will ever be queen. They can’t be.
Wouldn't Kate be the queen when William becomes King? She won't be the monarch like Elizabeth, but she'll be be a queen consort.
Kate will be queen. Why is anyone saying Kate won't be queen? Her husband is third in line behind Elizabeth and Charles. He'll be king, and he's not going to dump Kate
Royal Commentator. wrote:
If you are going to have a monarchy, at least base it on something meaningful, like looks, rather than a genetic lottery.
Dear lord there are some idiots posting here.
TAA wrote:
You guys are idiots...sans one wrote:
Neither will ever be queen. They can’t be.
Wouldn't Kate be the queen when William becomes King? She won't be the monarch like Elizabeth, but she'll be be a queen consort.
Yes, of course she will. Unless William dies or abdicates, he’s the king and his wife is the queen. She will not be as hot as the next in line, and, I suspect, that will cause a lot of palace intrigue because the King will want the best queen. History has told this story a thousand times.
They are just not famous wrote:
None of these people are really good looking. You can find much more attractive people anywhere.
Agree with that, but have to point out that Kate Middleton is hotter than Meghan Markle. Kate has a sylph like figure that carries off clothes better and a cute, natural face. Have you seen photos of Meghan close up in daylight? Yesterday's photos in the British press of the Royals visiting church showed her to have almost comedy style lip filler and the dip in her nose from her friendship with Charlie (not Prince Charlie but her and Harry's other, special friend) has been filled again, causing it look every more bulbous, so her upper lip is almost touching her nose now. Natural she is not. She's had a nose job earlier on, fake boobs put in then taken out again, and she has a LOT of facial fillers. I'd lay a bet on her having a collapsing septum, hence the witch's nose profile. From a distance she can look quite nice but her figure isn't all that either, she has a thick waist and broad back and the moment she puts on a little weight, she looks plain. Up close, her face also has a lot of moles. I wouldn't want to go near her.
Its always the plainer ones, rather than the great beauties, you have to watch out in the marrying for money stakes.
trollism wrote:
Banana Bread wrote:
I wish I could be the English president and just get rid of the royal family. They are pointless and waste money. I might run for it some year if I move there. I want to escape Trump.
Their cost to the tax payer is actually negligible compared to the amount of money they bring in through other methods.
Particularly now many of the younger royals are pretty much worldwide megastars.
He said they were a waste of money. He didn't specify whether to the taxpayer or to a broader group. They do waste money, though some people choose to contribute voluntarily in tourism. It doesn't mean they aren't wasteful to humanity overall.
TAA wrote:
Currently Kate is hotter. Royal handlers make Megan look a lot less attractive than she did on Suits.
Currently Kate is hotter because she isn't pregnant.
Kate > Megan easily
Neither will or can be queen.
Are you guys really that stupid? They are not of royal blood. They will retain their title as ‘princess’.
Don’t believe me?
Then why isn’t Queen Elizabeth’s husband called ‘King’?
Boggles the mind at the limited education of you guys on here.
The more recent novelty of having an American woman of color in the royal family is obscuring the fact that Kate is extremely gorgeous and was herself thought of as such a refreshing addition to the royals when she became betrothed to William. Memories really are short.
Thread full of idiots wrote:
Neither will or can be queen.
Are you guys really that stupid? They are not of royal blood. They will retain their title as ‘princess’.
Don’t believe me?
Then why isn’t Queen Elizabeth’s husband called ‘King’?
Boggles the mind at the limited education of you guys on here.
0/10
Royal Commentator. wrote:
It’s not even close. England can have a soft 7 or a hard 9 for their next queen. And Kate seems like nerd, which matches her nerd husband.
If you are going to have a monarchy, at least base it on something meaningful, like looks, rather than a genetic lottery.
You and some of the other posters in this thread seem to be representative of readers of “People” magazine who also are quite porn-addled. Congratulations.
The winner of the feud will be the hottest in the sack.