Could a trans person be sued for fraud if they didn't reveal themselves upfront before a date?

You can't sue someone if no harm is done. And what you are proposing is an extremely unlikely scenario. A more likely scenario is that you get jail time for assaulting them because you are an insecure bigot.

Not wanting your girlfriend to have a penis makes you a bigot? Wow!

How was Lola? I hope you had a good date.

>not specifically going after women with penises

Sued for what?

What are the damages ? You should sue your optometrist. If you can’t tell a tranny from an actual woman, you’re a dumba$$

Hey...trannies can suck a gold ball through a garden hose and take a pounding up their fudge tunnel.

If ‘she’ is a nice person, go for it.

Not successfully. Next.

Let"s Run, the land of rampant over-compensation.

Where did I ever state anything near hate for anyone? I proposed a simple scenario based on misrepresentation. I never once said anything other than that, and certainly never came near suggesting violence. And bigot? I said I always found Robin Roberts very attractive. So the one statement I made about personal preference is overlooked and I'm about ready to kick some trans rear-end, maybe, could be a bad-ass trans. Really wouldn't need to be that bad-ass.

So, to continue the question, what if the trans person accepted gifts, say totaling several thousand dollars? Is there any scenario where a suit would work? What about the religious side asked about earlier?

Cis Chris wrote:

TTH wrote:

Anyone can sue for nearly any reason but what wrong would be proven in this type of case?

I brought this up after reading the headline about the trans person in the beauty contest.

I'd say the wrong would be if the guy/gal was search a dating website and would believe they are looking at profiles of women, possibly one of whom might be a future husband/wife. But if you're cis, then this person is deceiving you. what if the web-site you were on was religious based, isn't e-harmony religious based? Would that play into the scenario?

Just hire a lawyer, roll the dice and see how it goes?

Now you sound like a real sore loser.

Cis Chris wrote:

Let"s Run, the land of rampant over-compensation.

Where did I ever state anything near hate for anyone? I proposed a simple scenario based on misrepresentation. I never once said anything other than that, and certainly never came near suggesting violence. And bigot? I said I always found Robin Roberts very attractive. So the one statement I made about personal preference is overlooked and I'm about ready to kick some trans rear-end, maybe, could be a bad-ass trans. Really wouldn't need to be that bad-ass.

So, to continue the question, what if the trans person accepted gifts, say totaling several thousand dollars? Is there any scenario where a suit would work? What about the religious side asked about earlier?

As I said, hire a lawyer, roll the dice and see how it goes. This is letsrun.com, not lawyers.com.

It shows how such a fool you are just for seeking legal advice in this website.

I don't see how you can make the argument that a trans person would be doing you harm by 'misrepresentation'. Dating is not some exchange of goods and services, it's just two people hanging out because first and foremost they enjoy eachother's company.

OP is literally stating that he considers dating the purchase of sexual favours from the other person via dinners, drinks and gifts, and should he not want what the other has to offer sexually then he is owed all his time and money back.

Quite disgusting.

Perhaps I could see a case being brought where the trans person has represented themselves as the opposite gender without having the full reassignment surgery and something happened sexually that you were uncomfortable with. Otherwise, I don’t see how there’s a case. I’d be willing to bet there are thousands of guys all over the USA who have slept with a trans woman without knowing it and have no idea.

Personally I think there is no problem if it's a date, meal, cinema, friendship.

If it's sex, then yes it's deception. The law (here) agrees.

For some reason there have been a lot of these cases in the UK, if you google. Most of them got jail time. I think the basic premise was regarding deception. The person thought e.g. they were having sex with a man, when in fact it was a woman using prosthetics. Completely pre-surgery. Not someone who has been living as a man for many years. I don't think people should trick people into having sex, so yes I would have issues with it. They may well have said no if they had been fully informed, so that's the issue. They are consenting to a sexual act they may not be OK with. It is deceptive and premeditated. Not good.

Track chick gets it.

ChickTrack wrote:

Track chick gets it.

Nah, it's not so black and white like that.