USA Basketball Player Stephen Curry (Golden State, California) doesn't think that USA Astronauts ever landed on Earth's Moon

Here is the official NASA blurb about how the simulated landings worked (James Hansen, 1995).

We can do an experiment though. (compare to Bach experiment linked in NYT below)

Take 20 NASA pics from Earth's Moon, and 20 fakes from a simulator, and ask USA people which are which.

Would they be able to tell?

push it all off into the future wrote:

Or maybe they did on Page 7 and I missed it wrote:

Now we just need some Hoax Deniers to claim that in 10 LRC pages this thread will be gone.

It will be over in 2026, when the Apollo docs are declassified by USA.

At the time NASA faked the Moon missions, they necessarily anticipated many people all around the globe who would dispute their tale. However they predicated upon that it would never spread much further than discussing it in their local pub, or at work, or in kooky books. (Was this CIA advice?) How wrong they were! In particular, NASA never deigned to envisage that 30 years later (from commercialized version of USA DARPA-Internet) the ease of practically every person in the world to share information and thoughts with one another in a matter of seconds. (CIA knew of/c this tech could be used for the both ends of any proposition, confusion or clarity) rerouting around the narrative controllers so carefully previously implanted.

As a studious Hoax Researcher, I am trying to a VIDEO of the supposed comment by Goldin (NASA head admin 1992-2001) talking to UK television TV personality Sheena McDonald, gives this purported quotation (perhaps again in an unguarded moment under pressure, forgetting which narrative to relay):

"Mankind cannot venture beyond Earth orbit until we can find a way to overcome deadly space radiation." - Daniel Goldin, 1994 UK television

Is this a true quotation? I can find OTHER interviews by this UK lady from 1994 on YouTube (Dawkins, Byrne)

So why not the NASA one? Is this is a cover-up from Google etc., or are these words invented and "made up" by Hoax Extremists to advance their agenda beyond where it already stands? You'd think because of its OBVIOUS importance, that some one would have uploaded it by now. Or has it been lost/destroyed like other evidence?

NASA forgot to simulate how the Moon Hoax would destroy the NASA Astronauts personal lives.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10150092/Drink-debauchery-and-despair-astronauts-wives-lift-lid-on-grim-reality-behind-the-smiling-Nasa-space-launches.html

Another boo-booh error from NASA ops. Here are 3 Header Data files (Apollo 16) from photos:

Date Taken (1972 Apr 19): Second Revolution around Earth's Moon

Date Taken (1972 Apr 20): 20th Revolution

Date Taken (1972 Apr 18): 63rd Revolution

What gives? Time travel too? Quality Control is imperative IMO.

Film Type: 70mm Date Taken: 04/19/72 (AS16-120-19187)

Description: The Apollo 16 astronauts captured this Earth rise scene with a handheld Hasselblad camera during the second revolution of the Moon.

Film Type: 70mm Date Taken: 04/20/72 (AS16-113-18282)

Description: View of the Apollo 16 Command/Service Module taken from the Lunar module while in orbit over the lunar surface. This photo was taken during the twelfth revolution around the Moon

Film Type: 70mm Date Taken: 04/18/72 (AS16-121-19449)

Description: This view of a portion of the lunar surface was photographed during Apollo 16's 63rd revolution of the Moon.

Or just the anomaly between Header Data, and webpage info (AS16-113-18282).

Header Data says 20 Apr in 12th revolution, webpage info says 23 Apr while approaching final rendezvous.

Again, whom to believe? NASA is unreliable, beyond repair.

No, no, NASA would never fake anything...

On Monday, YouTuber and former NASA engineer Mark Rober posted a video that went viral, garnering more than 46 million hits in just five days.

Now, he has posted about the "hoax" aspects....

The video, "Package Thief Versus Glitter Bomb Trap," shows Rober engineering a fake package to leave on his front porch in order to bait would-be delivery box bandits.

... in these two cases, the "thieves" were actually acquaintances of the person helping me. From the footage I received from the phones, which intentionally only record at specific times, this wasn't obvious to me.

Science bro wrote:

Legit question wrote:

Final score:

Legit Army- 100

Anti-hoaxers- 0

OneGiantLie

You are such a troll. Your source is crap. Mary DM Bennett: author of Dark Moon, which is just the same old conspiracy BS about the photos that has been thoroughly debunked. Oh, and she claims to have psychic abilities.

You've got nothing.

Typical illogic. von Braun states XYZ are impossible, but when he turns out to be wrong it's just science in action.

Or more historically, Galileo claims dubious reasons for tide motions, asserts theological reasons that orbits must be perfect circles, and yet is recorded as some sort of great scientist by history. Not to mention Kepler's "solar system" derived from a theory of Platonic solids.

But Bennett gets one thing wrong in her life, and it ruins her credibility totally? We don't read Newton for his long and voluminous Deist writings, do we?

Layers upon Layers rolling over again wrote:

M.A. Boyd (USA Environmental Protection Agency) (2009 conference paper)

For students graduating in health physics today, or nuclear workers relocating to the United States from

Europe or Asia, their employers will need to train them in systems of dosimetry going back 50 years. (i.e. man-on-moon era)

Amazing! Here's an actual USA government employee (EPA) openly SUGGESTING that radiation methodology from 50 years ago be FORGOTTEN by USA initiates into the dosimetry system!! This is said to be for "consistency" sake... Knowledge is Power, except when it doesn't fit the controlling narrative?

Not to mention that it's not clear why EPA is a valid USA organ to be efforting this. Where is OSHA or the like?

Clearly, deflecting to apparatchiki of a different bureau can aid in obfuscation in the overall. Most people (USA) would never connect their dots with "50 years" (from 2009) to the USA space program era when promulgated by EPA. But if NASA themselves advocated the same erasure of concept, the intent would be obvious, even to Hoax Deniers.

Ground Control wrote:

Of course the radiation dosimeters for Apollo 7 to 17 went to the moon and back, with astronauts and the command module.

Another non-fact by Hoax Deniers: Apollo 7 is admitted by NASA fanboys to only be low-earth orbit. The Wikipedia Propaganda page (complete with I Love Jeannie and headache advertisements) has already been posted in this LRC thread, so I'm not going to do it again.

Orbital parameters - Reference system : Geocentric

Regime Low Earth orbit

Perigee 227 kilometers (123 nmi) Apogee 301 kilometers (163 nmi)

Furthermore, it's perfectly possible that the dosimeters for Apollos 8 through 17 went to Earth's Moon and back in unmanned craft, while the astronauts were otherwise evacuated.

Space Control wrote:

it's perfectly possible that the dosimeters for Apollos 8 through 17 went to Earth's Moon and back in unmanned craft, while the astronauts were otherwise evacuated.

As Bad Wigins would say, Why get complicated? Just fake the dosimetry data thru and thru.

How would anyone ever know to the contrary?

Anti-hoaxers, you are getting destroyed. Time to admit defeat.

Bahahahahahahahaha

[quote]Just Doing MY Part, to find Truth for All wrote:

"Mankind cannot venture beyond Earth orbit until we can find a way to overcome deadly space radiation." - Daniel Goldin, 1994 UK television (?)

Is this a true quotation? ... Is this is a cover-up from Google etc., or are these words invented and "made up" by Hoax Extremists to advance their agenda beyond where it already stands? .../quote]

It's a standard counter-intelligence to embed kooks/extremists in the opposition numbers for discreditation.

You can be sure that NASA/CIA have known this for decades.

Data don't lie wrote:

Or just the anomaly between Header Data, and webpage info (AS16-113-18282).

Header Data says 20 Apr in 12th revolution, webpage info says 23 Apr while approaching final rendezvous.

Again, whom to believe? NASA is unreliable, beyond repair.

https://science.ksc.nasa.gov/mirrors/images/images/pao/AS16/10075829.htmhttps://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/apollo/apollo16/html/as16-113-18282.html

Another Great Find!! We've been getting all sorts of pertinent and probing evidence from indefatigable Hoax Researchers in this LRC thread!

This is exactly the sort of "anomaly" occurring when you are mixing+matching photo snippets in an ad hoc scrapbook many decades after the "fact", and forget which is supposed to be what. Then you disengage any enquiries, basing upon status of the NASA bureaucratic complex.

We deserve better. If the so-called Manned Moon Landings are in fact real, the institution deemed for its posterity must preserve it. Yet they invert the privilege, boondoggle any number of blatant errors, and claim "lack of funding" is their obstacle to common scientific decency.

Radiation effect is cumulative. What's so hard to understand that 6-days of radiation is a small risk, falling below some safety threshold, but that this is not true for longer Mars missions?

You are not the right one to keep score. The moon-conspiracy arguments, nor your scorekeeping, do not pass peer-review.

Legit question wrote:

Anti-hoaxers, you are getting destroyed. Time to admit defeat.

Both these are deft notions.

The Tentacled Octopus of USA govt is hard to track down in all multiple forms. Leaving shrapnel everywhere.

Just like you ran away in the flat-earth threads, you have some unanswered questions here about the moon, Van Allen belts and the Orion mission. We were just talking about the Orion Exploration Flight Test, measuring the high radiation of the inner Van Allen belt, at a height of 3600 miles (or 3130 nautical miles). Since the flat-earth needs to form one coherent view of the universe, with all observed evidence, it is not out of line to ask a flat-earther how these flight experiments make sense to them. How does a flat-earther like you reconcile a mission that went 600 miles beyond your flat-earth moon orbit, with a theory that man was not able to get there. Do flat-earthers think that the moon and sun circle within the inner Van Allen belt? This is puzzling when the belts are caused largely by solar winds. Do the sun and moon and the Van Allen belts disprove a flat earth? Is that why you ran away from flat-earth threads? Try to answer with existing observable evidence rather than making up new facts. In the flat-earth threads, you've had plenty of opportunities to answer the mountain-top experiment question, and you've remained silent, choosing to disappear and run away at the first sign of having to actually demonstrate and apply personal understanding, rather than mindlessly propagating someone else's "research" based on the results of a google search. Even here, you've brought nothing but Pablo Novi's argument as to why he doubts man mooned landings, often referencing a lengthy non-peer reviewed opinion blog -- doubts which were completely debunked there. At some point his primary argument seemed to be: "you guys are mean so whatever I think must be right because mean guys cannot be both right and mean, and you being wrong means I must be right."

Legit question wrote:

I will be happy to talk Flat Earth, if you go to the other thread.