Just like the Kavanaugh womenz! Off with their willies!
Just like the Kavanaugh womenz! Off with their willies!
Avenatti is trying to figure out how to angle himself into this one, I'm sure.
...+...-xyz wrote:
Burkman (tweeter), and Wohl (organizer?) are behind this?!
Almost would be better to have Project Veritas and Breitbart as character elements.
https://sludgefeed.com/disgraced-teen-hedge-fund-manager-jacob-wohl-started-alt-news-site/
Wohl stopped responding to NBC News after being told Surefire’s official phone number redirects to his mother’s voicemail.
LOL!
But wait, there’s more! Ed Krassenstein, a Democratic activist best known for trolling President Trump on Twitter, claimed that Burkman had told him Jacob Wohl - a controversial Trump-supporting Twitter personality - was behind Surefire Intelligence, the mysterious outfit that supposedly produced the accuser.
"To me, this was all a setup from somebody trying to discredit the media," Krassenstein told NBC News.
“I don't have any involvement in any investigations of any kind. I'm not quite that cool,” Wohl told NBC when reached by direct message on Twitter. NBC reported that Surefire’s official phone number redirects to voicemail at a number public records show belongs to Wohl’s mother, however.
13 days ago I received this tip alleging an attempt to pay off women to make up accusations of sexual misconduct against Special Counsel Bob Mueller. Other reporters received the same email. Now the Special Counsel's office is telling us they've referred the matter to the FBI
This "urgent tip" sounds even more ridiculous than the other claims. Sending this out en masse to a bunch of 'friendly' reporters? Get real. Clearly FBI Deep State spies saw the evidence of rapist Mueller appearing on the horizon (NSA sees everything), and so spun out this phoney fake to conflate it, as their Psy-Ops 101 class teaches.
2020 hopeful wrote:
Avenatti is trying to figure out how to angle himself into this one, I'm sure.
Won't be surprising if these women accusing Mueller are suddenly "clammed up" when they see how much the self-protection racket is running at the FBI. Accountable to no one and beyond, only a whole sale cleansing can renew our faith and confidence in USA federal law enforcement, particularly after the last decade.
Hard to believe the Atlantic would publish this (after their kooky anti-Kavanaugh exposure), but: Atlantic reporter Natasha Bertrand adds that the (1974) woman in question would not speak to anyone on the phone so they haven’t really confirmed her story.
Another reporter, Scott Stedman, who was approached by the same woman described his experience on Twitter. Stedman seems very suspicious that this story may not be on the level.
2 weeks ago, I, along with other journalists were set an email from a woman who alleged that she was a former colleague of Mueller. She said that Jack Burkman, via an intermediary, offered her tens of thousands to make up sexual assault claims against Mueller.
The intermediary, in messages to me (see attached) confirmed the story. I don't know the true identity of this person OR the person who sent the original email.
I don't know what to make of what has transpired. I didn't find the woman reliable. I found that the intermediary was oddly eager to share details. I discussed this with other journalists, mainly @NatashaBertrand, but I concluded that this was an effort to discredit the media.
I want to make this entirely clear: There is ZERO evidence that a woman actually exists in this story.
Of course, these "crack reporters" COMPLETELY IGNORED the 2010 rape incident, in their efforts.
Then they act as if this PHONEY 1974 story (likely a psy-op) invalidated the 2010 RAPE TRUTH?
https://twitter.com/ScottMStedman/status/1057323611709571072https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DqxeqWDVYAER9mf.jpgYes, the 1974 psy-op (narrative confusion) is now showing up as holey as Swiss'd cheese.
This started w/ a person claiming to be 'Lorraine' emailing that 'she' worked with Mueller at a law firm in 1974. The law firm she named, Pillsbury, says no Lorraine worked in its S.F. office with Mueller in the 1970's. That's a fact. The rest seems fishier than a tuna sandwich.
The "woman" who started this entire thing doesn't appear to exist. The law firm says she never worked there. The phone number of the intermediary who allegedly offered the cash has been disconnected.
The plan was to convince people in the media that Jack Burkman was trying to pay women to make false allegations. Well, now it's up to USA people to decide whether this "plan" will work.....
I already posted about this in the Trump thread earlier today, but will repost here because this story is hilarious.
Reporters at The Hill get contacted by a woman who says she was offered money in exchange for accusing Mueller of being a sexual assaulter. She gave them a phone number that had been given to her by her mystery contact. When they contacted it, they received a threat in response to "drop this." They also get a call from a guy who claims he is with a company called "Surefire Intelligence" who also threatened them and admitted to dealing with this same woman. This was all reported to the special counsel.
Jack Burkman (Republican lobbyist/talk radio personality) then tweets out that he'll be revealing Robert Mueller's "sexual assault victims" on Thursday. He tells the Hill that he is bringing these women to light by coordinating with an agency called SureFire Intelligence, which is actually run by ... Jacob Wohl, an alt-right personality and former teenage wunderkind in securities fraud. Wohl claims to have no knowledge of this company, but the registration record for it is under Jacob Wohl's name and the agency's "official phone number" redirects to a voicemail box registered to Jacob's mommy. LOL!
https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1057371849439502338
In other words, two stupid Republican operatives attempted to bribe women to make false accusations against Mueller in an effort to undermine an ongoing FBI investigation and were caught in the act before they could release their fake story. Still, the conservative propaganda outlet Gateway Pundit (which is also Jacob Wohl's employer) ran the fake news anyway!
It gets better! The bogus accusation documents say Robert Mueller raped this anonymous woman on August 2, 2010 in his hotel suite on the 19th floor of the St. Regis in NYC.
Robert Mueller was documented attending jury duty in DC that day and the 19th floor of the St. Regis is an athletic club.
We must immediately investigate his high school drinking habits. Does he like beer? Did he boof in 11th grade? How many times did he say Ffffff ? Did he do the Devil’s Triangle with Corey Booker and Barney Frank?
We need an FBI investigation and Mueller should suspend his work until its complete .
At least we know if this ever made it to the Supremes, the likely deciding vote probably has strong feelings about these sort of accusations.
Meh. Mueller is just a guy. A guy who happens to be a pro. Nothing untoward in his past invalidates the investigation he leads.
media are all a like wrote:
Yes, the 1974 psy-op (narrative confusion) is now showing up as holey as Swiss'd cheese.
This started w/ a person claiming to be 'Lorraine' emailing that 'she' worked with Mueller at a law firm in 1974. The law firm she named, Pillsbury, says no Lorraine worked in its S.F. office with Mueller in the 1970's. That's a fact. The rest seems fishier than a tuna sandwich.
The "woman" who started this entire thing doesn't appear to exist. The law firm says she never worked there. The phone number of the intermediary who allegedly offered the cash has been disconnected.
The plan was to convince people in the media that Jack Burkman was trying to pay women to make false allegations. Well, now it's up to USA people to decide whether this "plan" will work.....
What did the "USA people" decide?
During today’s press conference Wohl and Burkman released the name of the woman who claimed she was raped by Robert Mueller in a New York hotel room in 2010. We want to interview the accuser before we post more on the allegations. She is a public figure (fashion designer) but did not show up at the press conference today, due to credible threats against her person. On Thursday, in abundance of due caution, The Gateway Pundit temporarily suspended our publishing arrangement with Wohl, as we need to collect more information on this explosive situation, before proceeding further.
The duplicity of the left and their media lapdogs regarding the #MeToo movement was on full display today in Washington DC. As is well known, creepy-porn star lawyer Michael Avenatti was the toast of the town when he made Stormy Daniels a household name. But on Thursday the reaction of the media to the Mueller accusations was quite the opposite! Americans hate the biased mainstream media (MSM) for a reason.
The number of Russian trolls on this thread is outstanding.
The woman accusing Robert Mueller of rape has nothing to financially gain from coming forward with her allegations against the special counsel and her testimony can be corroborated, the attorney representing the accuser and the journalist who discovered her maintain. In an exclusive interview with the Gateway Pundit, journalist and founder of Sure Fire Intelligence Jacob Wohl and Washington DC based attorney Jack Burkman debunked media reports claiming they paid women to accuse Mueller, the special counsel tasked with investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 election, of sexual assault.
"I am the biggest skeptic in the world of the #MeToo movement. My default position is not to believe the women " - you've seen that over and over again as one story after another has come out. And that indeed was my default position in this case. I don't care who's getting accused or who's accusing - my default position is I don't believe it until its proven, until its corroborated," Wohl told Gateway Pundit Wednesday night. "I went through the story with the accuser, the gal who had hired our firm, and I asked her many, many questions: where did it happen? When did it happen? Do you have any corroborating witnesses? And over and over again I determined her credibility to be very high, very high."
Meanwhile, MSM/Deep State have hit back with their "Lorraine Parsons" psy-op, to try to distract from actual credible accusations.
Wohl, a Gateway Pundit contributor, explained that he first encountered the woman accusing Mueller of sexual assault when she hired his intelligence firm, Sure Fire Intelligence, to investigate assets that were misappropriated by her accountant.
"The story begins when a client of my firm, Sure Fire Intelligence, who had hired us to handle an estate matter earlier tracked down some assets that were misappropriated by her accountant, brought me a story that frankly I didn't believe," he said. "There was no quid quo pro here. She was not offered any money. There was no exchange of any kind that happened between myself, that happened between Mr. Burkman here, and this accuser. The only person that claims any such thing, any kind of quid quo pro, any kind of payment, any kind of bribery or impropriety ... is a women who the media has brought forth ("Lorraine Parsons") and breathlessly reported on who appears to not even exist.
"The media is reporting on [Parsons] to distract from and discredit the real allegation. Who is this women? Who created her? Probably Mueller, probably the mainstream media (MSM), I don't know. That will probably come out at some as well," he continued. "[The accuser] gave us her story. She went point by point. She gave us time, she gave us dates. We carefully vetted that story. We wrote it into an affidavit, which she has signed. She also has a corroborating witness."
"The accuser is not a person off the streets. This is a person of unimpeachable character. This is a person with an illustrious background as a fashion designer - well educated, well networked, well liked. This is not a person that somebody dragged up from some politically charged area. In fact, she is not politically charged at all - never registered to vote! Never voted, in fact. So, this is not a political operation, this has very little to do with politics," he said. "This is about getting the truth out about a person who is wielding a tremendous amount of power and we've seen what he's done with it."
Meanwhile, if the media or law enforcement can find Parsons, Burkman and Wohl pledged to testify under oath to prove they've never interacted with her.
Another MSM imaginer is Vermont Law School professor Jennifer Taub [again from politically charged academic world like Palo Alto's media darling], who claims she received an email on Oct. 22 floating an offer to discuss past encounters with Mueller, with the promise of money. Of course, neither Burkman nor Wohl have ever actually corresponded with Taub!
"I want to debunk this whole sad and tragic back story so we can get the focus back on our gal, our accuser and the main story. Loraine Parsons, whom we allegedly paid (we didn't pay her), the problem is Loraine Parsons doesn't exist (!). She's a phantom that somebody conjured," Burkman said. "There's a woman named Jennifer Taub, who does exist, but she received some email referencing in a vague way payment from a person who doesn't exist. That email also had nothing to do with us.
"Anybody with an IQ above 80 can very quickly see that there is no truth whatsoever to this back story and these allegations. We can only surmise as to who did this. My strong suspicion is that it was done to slow us down. Every reporter in the country, from the smallest blog all the way up to NBC news, knows very well that you don't run a story about (so-called) Loraine Parsons before you even talk to Loraine Parsons. I think its ridiculous, the last few days have been ridiculous more than anything else. When we present the allegations, we will regain the initiative and that's the key."
The woman accusing Mueller of rape was slated to detail her encounter with the special counsel at a press conference Burkman and Wohl are hosting in Arlington, Virginia Thursday at noon.
Of course, MSM has already decided its narrative, and will likely not show up!
UPADTE: Upon arriving in Washington, DC, Wohl said she panicked and boarded a flight to another location. Below is a photo of Wohl and the accuser, who at this time is fearful for her life and requests to remain anonymous.
Reporters and the mainstream media are intent on protecting Mueller and have relentlessly harassed and smeared Wohl since learning that he will bring forth a woman accusing Mueller of sexual assault, the 20 year old journalist explained.
"The reaction of the press has been one of the most disturbing things that I've ever seen," he said. "I have had Oliver Darcy from CNN calling up my eleven year old sister while she is sitting in her sixth grade classroom, over and over again. I have had Rachel Maddow implicating my mother in this, simply because my cell phone happens to be on a family plan (something which is perfectly normal), it has been reported to law enforcement.
"This is all an effort as we know to protect Robert Mueller, who many people know to be a character who is not on the up and up. These allegations will come forward. The accusers will tell their stories in a credible way, with corroboration. Now, believe me, we've received plenty of b.s. accusations, where we get somebody that comes in, they've got some story to tell about Mueller, we look into it, its like: hey, he wasn't even there, sorry. You don't have a witness: we can't help you. We are bringing forth accusations against Robert Mueller which are 100 percent credible."
"We started vetting her case the beginning of October, maybe late September. We came forward now because this is the soonest time in which we felt comfortable coming forward. We needed to make sure this was rock solid," he said. "We were not going to bring forward a Christine Blasey Ford whose going to get up there and say like: I don't remember when it happened, I don't remember where it happened, sometime in the 80s.
"In this case, not only is the accuser credible, but one of her best friends who was also there watched her go up to the hotel room allegedly with Robert Mueller. This corroborating witness is also very credible. This is not a person looking for profit. These are not people who are politically motivated. These people aren't political, they've never voted. They are certainly not looking for profit, and they certainly don't need profit. I'll put it this way, these are a couple of very wealthy people, prominent people."
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/11/exclusive-jacob-wohl-jack-burkman-woman-accusing-mueller-of-rape-is-credible-vetted-media-protecting-special-counsel-video/The accuser's name is Carolyne Cass of Cass Fashion.
Fearing for her life, she took a plane out of DC before the news conference revealed her name.
She was 25 years of age at the time of the assault and didn't know who Mueller was. She is a well-educated, family-oriented fashion designer. Cass was a student at NYU, Art Institute of Dallas, and Parsons.
Miss Cass doesn't watch the news and didn't know what was going on and who Mueller was until recently. She does appear to be a real person but that's all we will commit to, other than we always believe the woman.
The accuser allegedly says it happened eight years ago.
https://i1.wp.com/www.independentsentinel.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/carolyne-cass.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dq7iQObUUAE0F5n.jpgAnother non-news watcher wrote:
The accuser's name is Carolyne Cass of Cass Fashion.
Fearing for her life, she took a plane out of DC before the news conference revealed her name.
Curiously, the FBI.gov "press release" page is suddenly turning up EMPTY searches from 2010 press releases, like those that described Mueller's visit to NYC at the time when he raped Miss Cass.
Fortunately, the press conference had hard copies, so that the Internet memory hole deletion trick (as seen in so many other coverups, like Comey, McCabe, HRC) won't work here.
It's still not clear whether the Aug 2 date is accurate and he travelled up to NYC after his "jury duty" (clearly a photo-op virtue-signalling issue, as he was immediately excused, obviously, for being in law enforcement).
Jakob Ingebrigtsen has a 1989 Ferrari 348 GTB and he's just put in paperwork to upgrade it
Is there a rule against attaching a helium balloon to yourself while running a road race?
How rare is it to run a sub 5 minute mile AND bench press 225?
Am I living in the twilight zone? The Boston Marathon weather was terrible!
Mark Coogan says that if you could only do 3 workouts as a 1500m runner you should do these
Move over Mark Coogan, Rojo and John Kellogg share their 3 favorite mile workouts
Strava thinks the London Marathon times improved 12 minutes last year thanks to supershoes
