Fixed that for you.
Fixed that for you.
3rd place (Jennifer Wagner) claims it's unfair for me to compete. At Masters Worlds, she beat me in the 500m TT. She beat me in 6 of 7 races at the 2017 Intelligentsia Cup. In 2016 she beat me in all 3 Speed Week crits. She's won 11 of our 13 races
In other words, 11/13 of the time the trans- unfairness was overcome by superior effort.
Women are not showing a backbone because they have always needed, and always will need the patriarchy to protect them. It is us men who are letting them down. Strong and good men created the rule of law, spilled their blood on battlefields throughout history, and worked night and day to create an ordered society to protect women. Women are not up to the challenge of fighting to protect the eternal boundaries and keep the rule of law in place. It always was and always will be men who control these realms.
Considering that statistically HALF of those so-called "men" (strong and good?) were ACTUALLY latently trans-WOMEN, your argument doesn't hold its own water.
zxczxczxczxc wrote:
celery wrote:
What about the boundary of not having sex with your children? Should we get rid of that "bigoted bias" too?
As long as the man identifies as a child he should have the right to have sex with my children. I understand adults cannot have sex with my children, because of some law or something, but child-identified men should have that right at least. Otherwise they might commit suicide or complain about it.
This wins the analogy award of the year. Prize is most people you encounter not being able to keep up. Congrats.
Second Place wrote: "No one is a transgender to steal anyone’s medal. We had an honest race under [Union Cycliste Internationale] rules. If you compete you accept the rules, otherwise, don’t compete,” van Herrikhuyzen wrote in response to a Twitter commenter.
Wagner replied: “Just because it’s a CURRENT UCI rule doesn’t make it fair or right. And rules can be changed.”
“I think there is absolutely no evidence that I have an unfair advantage,” McKinnon said in an interview with VeloNews.
Three Opinions wrote:
“I think there is absolutely no evidence that I have an unfair advantage,” McKinnon said in an interview with VeloNews.
I think there is absolutely no evidence that there should be a Women's Masters in the first place.
After years of fighting to create their own athletic opportunities, it is agonizing to see the increasingly common photos of women and girls standing, defeated, beneath or behind victorious male competitors. Thank you for speaking up for what's fair, not all feel they can.
[quote]Why must women put up or get out for questioning systemic reorganization, rather than males who demand this accommodation? Women's sports ≠ redress for those who don't fit in. Displaced females who "had to go through" the unimaginable in life to compete- where should THEY go?
Who Can SHOUT the LOUDEST! wrote:
I think there is absolutely no evidence that there should be a Women's Masters in the first place.
IOC President Baron Pierre de Coubertin was implacable, angling for the continued marginalization of women’s sports. After the 1912 Stockholm Games, he and many of his IOC colleagues believed “an Olympiad with females would be impractical, uninteresting, unaesthetic and improper.”
The 1928 Olympics in Amsterdam was the first time that doubled the number of female participants: almost 300 women took part in the Games, thanks largely to the inclusion of a small slate of women’s track and field events. However, citing medical evidence, the IOC ruled after the Amsterdam Games that the 800-meter run was too dangerous. In Amsterdam, after completing the race, a number of competitors fell to the turf to regain their strength. As women were too frail to run such distances, they were not allowed to compete in the 800-meter run until the 1960 Olympics in Rome.
https://www.bitchmedia.org/article/forgotten-history-female-athletes-who-organized-their-own-olympicsAlex Jones Show: Transgenderism is a Eugenics Population Control Operation Paving the Way For Human Extinction
Watch the most banned broadcast in the world as Alex Jones breaks down the globalist plan to destroy humanity and remember to spread this link and fight back against tyranny
AnalogyWinner wrote:
As long as the man identifies as a child he should have the right to have sex with my children. I understand adults cannot have sex with my children, because of some law or something, but child-identified men should have that right at least. Otherwise they might commit suicide or complain about it.
This is SO sexist. Anyone who follows the news, would know how often it is that WOMEN who rape teenage males, especially high school teachers who do this (and almost never face any real charges).
What's the award for when clever posters completely derail a trolling thread?
The movement exploits vulnerable people for socio-political points At some point even the most rabid of transgender partisans are going to have to admit: This whole thing is a bizarre, indefensible sham. Men cannot become women; women cannot become men. That is simply the cold, hard truth of the matter. If you are born a man or a woman, that is what you are; it doesn’t matter if you have a beard, or wear eyeliner, or if you rechristen yourself with a name most typical for the opposite sex. Facts are facts.
In the end, of course, we cannot forget what is at the heart of transgenderism: People who desperately need both help and sympathy. As our observer writes: “What seems obvious to me is that [transgender individuals] are uncomfortable with their bodies, suffer from other issues like anxiety and depression, and see the attention and attractiveness of transition as a way out.” Anyone who is determined to fight against transgender ideology must also remember that the people most affected by it are very real and very much victims–of a socio-political craze that has turned their vulnerabilities into the sorts of things you see here.
celery wrote:
Just on a basic probabilistic view, if you believe the "binary" splitting of human/horse (i.e. nonhuman) as sports demands, then there's clearly an obvious 50% chance than ANYONE will be either horse or not (cis-species).
To spell it out,
25% chance human born as horse (trans)
25% chance horse born as horse (cis)
25% chance horse born as human (trans)
25% chance human born as human (cis)
Of course, with a wider (brighter) species spectrum the case analogies are not so enumerable.
So with 50% of the population latently as trans-species, WHY is it so surprising that "suddenly" a good number of them realize it??
I don't understand this argument? Surely there are more species than just human/horse. Counting all the literally hundreds of thousands of beetle species, and that there's like 10^17 ants and many more nematode worms than that, I'd make it about a 0.000000000000001% chance than any given entity that's merely BORN as a human is ACTUALLY human.
math guy here wrote:
So with 50% of the population latently as trans-species, WHY is it so surprising that "suddenly" a good number of them realize it??
I don't understand this argument? Surely there are more species than just human/horse. Counting all the literally hundreds of thousands of beetle species, and that there's like 10^17 ants and many more nematode worms than that, I'd make it about a 0.000000000000001% chance than any given entity that's merely BORN as a human is ACTUALLY human.[/quote]
Another thing, This is just in considering the animal kingdom. I forget how much DNA we share with our plant/fungi/protozoon kindred, but it's likely quite significant when you think about it.
Or punctuation; even wrote:
Women's Cycling, where Biological Male, wins Women's World Championship (UCI) for age 35-39 Masters when representing Canada
Dew ewe even grammer?
Most LRC thread titles end up mangled. Either from brojos themselves, or some auto-editing I'd guess.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ItsPat.jpgcelery wrote:
Looks fair to me wrote:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DpeodPPU8AUEib6.jpgThe most annoying part is that this guy looks like a pudgy dweeb, not even athletic. If your gonna rob women of their spot on a podium, at least do enough work to look like a real athlete.
https://www.denverpost.com/2018/10/16/aurora-dog-sex-jail-sentence/Not enuff pics wrote:
[quote]is this considered bestiality? wrote:
'My partner is a dog': The transgender man who identifies as a canine
So many questions so little motivation to read the whole article
Unintended Consequences wrote:
https://www.denverpost.com/2018/10/16/aurora-dog-sex-jail-sentence/Not enuff pics wrote:
[quote]is this considered bestiality? wrote:
'My partner is a dog': The transgender man who identifies as a canine
So many questions so little motivation to read the whole article
Omg, that dudes mug shot is awesome.
Quite ridiculous to be jailed for making love to your own dog. Why even buy a dog if you aren't allowed to make love with it? This should be the next social movement after transgenderism is fully accepted, alongside of course pedophilia. All boundaries must be destroyed.
zzxczxc wrote:
Quite ridiculous to be jailed for making love to your own dog. Why even buy a dog if you aren't allowed to make love with it? This should be the next social movement after transgenderism is fully accepted, alongside of course pedophilia. All boundaries must be destroyed.
The main issue is that the dog can't consent (or at least, current laws don't accept the dog's consent, e.g. by tail wagging).
This is why trans-dogs are (currently) superior pets.
South-Parked wrote:
Or punctuation; even wrote:
Dew ewe even grammer?
I like the fact that the OP tries to Blame Canada for this mess.
Rachel McKinnon should receive the Order of Canada for this trailblazing victory!