FFF wrote:
Rupp, with every advantage possible today, is just over two minutes faster than this dude ran, over hills, at NYC. Rupp run NYC yet?
Meanwhile, the whole world is running 7 minutes faster than this racewalking dude ran.
Now this is the kind of absurd statement that makes it hard to take this board seriously at times. Leaving aside that Salazar's 2:08:13 at NYC in 1981 was found to have been run on a short course, the proposition that, "the whole world is running 7 minutes faster" doesn't pass even the most basic smell test.
First off, Kipchoge's world record is 2:01:39 which is only 6:34 faster than 2:08:13. So, not even a single person has run "7 minutes faster" than Salazar. Even if we don't take your 7 minutes statement so literally, the fact of the matter is that only one individual has ever run under 2:02, and that individual has only done so once (on a record eligible course). That individual also happens to be the greatest marathoner who ever lived, so definitely not, "the whole world" by any stretch.
Taking it further, only one individual has ever run in the 2:02s (and again only once). Only seven individuals have ever run in the 2:03s. When you consider that Galen has beaten several of those eight individuals (Kimetto + the seven in the 2:03's) in head-to-head racing, its hard to argue that even those eight guys truly on another level. I'll gladly concede that Kipchoge is in fact on a totally different level. The most reasonable statement one could make about the current state of world class marathon running, and Rupp's place in it, would be the following:
Winning a first tier international marathon requires the ability to run 2:05:XX or faster under ideal conditions. Galen Rupp may not be at quite at that level yet, and may never be. However, he has shown an ability to consistently perform at just below that level when it counts, which makes him a threat to place in those same races when those faster than him falter.