there aren't many college freshmen who are 17 or 18 by the time june rolls around. maybe him being about a year older than your average frosh matters to some people but, for me, the age is basically irrelevant. the reason i cited him being a true frosh as impressive is because he has therefore very little racing experience at the top level. winning a ncaa title - especially at 1500m - usually requires some more tactical savvy than your average true frosh has. to me, in the middle distances, being a year or so older than a "normal" frosh doesn't matter a lick. by the time guys reach 18 or 19, they're about as developed physically as they will be a year later. the tactical savvy (witness mcdougal last week) is what comes with being older, not quite so much the physical - though obviously a 27 year old will likely be able to run faster than a 20 year old. one year doesn't make the difference for me.